<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas Inks $300M Deal With ESPN For Longhorn Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mrsec.com/2011/01/texas-inks-300m-deal-with-espn-for-longhorn-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2011/01/texas-inks-300m-deal-with-espn-for-longhorn-network/</link>
	<description>Up to the minute SEC football and basketball news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Cal</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2011/01/texas-inks-300m-deal-with-espn-for-longhorn-network/comment-page-1/#comment-9293</link>
		<dc:creator>Cal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/01/texas-inks-300m-deal-with-espn-for-longhorn-network/#comment-9293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Houstonvol, 
 
The SEC would go after East Tennessee State University before they bring in a school from Pennsylvania.  Part of the whole SEC mantra is being THE SOUTHEASTERN Conference.  Sorry, not going to go after a school in northern PA.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Houstonvol, </p>
<p>The SEC would go after East Tennessee State University before they bring in a school from Pennsylvania.  Part of the whole SEC mantra is being THE SOUTHEASTERN Conference.  Sorry, not going to go after a school in northern PA.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The rich get richer</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2011/01/texas-inks-300m-deal-with-espn-for-longhorn-network/comment-page-1/#comment-9246</link>
		<dc:creator>The rich get richer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/01/texas-inks-300m-deal-with-espn-for-longhorn-network/#comment-9246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Pennington has an excellent analysis of future conference expansion involving the University of Texas, already the nation&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pennington has an excellent analysis of future conference expansion involving the University of Texas, already the nation&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reply</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2011/01/texas-inks-300m-deal-with-espn-for-longhorn-network/comment-page-1/#comment-9207</link>
		<dc:creator>Reply</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/01/texas-inks-300m-deal-with-espn-for-longhorn-network/#comment-9207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which way do the dominoes fall?  If what you say were to happen, the real question mark would be Oklahoma.  Joe C preached all summer that OU would stick w/ UT, but it sure sounded like a move w/ TAMU to SEC was also on the table.  TAMU would never be allowed to move w/o assurances that B12-2 sticks together (if that&#039;s what UT wants), ie OU staying put.  This deal does nothing w/ regard to keeping B12-2 together.  The same inequities that are driving the conf apart just got worse.  Will the next tv deal meet expectations promised by Beebe &amp; will any of the have-nots get a better offer...the game is still on. 
M - I - Z... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which way do the dominoes fall?  If what you say were to happen, the real question mark would be Oklahoma.  Joe C preached all summer that OU would stick w/ UT, but it sure sounded like a move w/ TAMU to SEC was also on the table.  TAMU would never be allowed to move w/o assurances that B12-2 sticks together (if that&#039;s what UT wants), ie OU staying put.  This deal does nothing w/ regard to keeping B12-2 together.  The same inequities that are driving the conf apart just got worse.  Will the next tv deal meet expectations promised by Beebe &amp; will any of the have-nots get a better offer&#8230;the game is still on.<br />
M &#8211; I &#8211; Z&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Houstonvol</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2011/01/texas-inks-300m-deal-with-espn-for-longhorn-network/comment-page-1/#comment-9196</link>
		<dc:creator>Houstonvol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 03:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/01/texas-inks-300m-deal-with-espn-for-longhorn-network/#comment-9196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I personally think this will keep the B12 together more than break it apart. First - the state of Texas is facing massive budet cuts. The bulk of the ESPN contract goes directly to the University, not the athletic department. Which means the State legislature can control how the money is spent. The state of Texas will be looking out to protect the major universities in the state. This contract basically guarantees that TU is going to be in good shape. However what about the other major university Texas A&amp;M(TAMU)? I see the marriage of the SEC and TAMU happening soon, and with the state of Texas blessing. Why? This will allow the B12 to bring in Houston to replace TAMU. TAMU will now have have access to the SEC money, and the University of Houston (which was just promoted to tier one research status) will have access to the Big12 money. This protects and strengthens the three top universities in Texas. With 287 million of the $300 million going directly to the general university fund - The powers to be will have sway over what Texas does conference wise. There is a lot of pressure in Austin (legislature not school) to protect the other tier one research university in the state - Houston. Realignment is as much or more about academics than athletics. If the Texas schools can shift around to protect themselves, then they will do it. This will protect the five major power schools in the state - TU, TAMU, UH and Tech and Baylor. The Texas alumni and fans were not happy with the prospect of having most of their away games so far away with the PAC. I don&#039;t see TU separating from OU conference wise. The little sisters of the Big 12 saw what the future would be like if the Big 12 dissolved - so they will keep quite. TU will keep the B12 together. It will help the non-revenue sports with scheduling and travel. The state will demand that it protect the other Texas schools by holding the purse strings to that $287 million. However I suspect that TAMU will be in the SEC come this summer. Who will the SEC bring in for balance? My vote is a school that is not in your Expansion list - Pitt; Top rank research university, major TV market, major recruiting state, top notch basketball program, and a football program that would not upset the hierarchy of the SEC football powers. Before you think they are in the north - technically so is Kentucky.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think this will keep the B12 together more than break it apart. First &#8211; the state of Texas is facing massive budet cuts. The bulk of the ESPN contract goes directly to the University, not the athletic department. Which means the State legislature can control how the money is spent. The state of Texas will be looking out to protect the major universities in the state. This contract basically guarantees that TU is going to be in good shape. However what about the other major university Texas A&amp;M(TAMU)? I see the marriage of the SEC and TAMU happening soon, and with the state of Texas blessing. Why? This will allow the B12 to bring in Houston to replace TAMU. TAMU will now have have access to the SEC money, and the University of Houston (which was just promoted to tier one research status) will have access to the Big12 money. This protects and strengthens the three top universities in Texas. With 287 million of the $300 million going directly to the general university fund &#8211; The powers to be will have sway over what Texas does conference wise. There is a lot of pressure in Austin (legislature not school) to protect the other tier one research university in the state &#8211; Houston. Realignment is as much or more about academics than athletics. If the Texas schools can shift around to protect themselves, then they will do it. This will protect the five major power schools in the state &#8211; TU, TAMU, UH and Tech and Baylor. The Texas alumni and fans were not happy with the prospect of having most of their away games so far away with the PAC. I don&#039;t see TU separating from OU conference wise. The little sisters of the Big 12 saw what the future would be like if the Big 12 dissolved &#8211; so they will keep quite. TU will keep the B12 together. It will help the non-revenue sports with scheduling and travel. The state will demand that it protect the other Texas schools by holding the purse strings to that $287 million. However I suspect that TAMU will be in the SEC come this summer. Who will the SEC bring in for balance? My vote is a school that is not in your Expansion list &#8211; Pitt; Top rank research university, major TV market, major recruiting state, top notch basketball program, and a football program that would not upset the hierarchy of the SEC football powers. Before you think they are in the north &#8211; technically so is Kentucky.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
