<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UM&#8217;s Mackey Now Says His Speech Issues Aren&#8217;t Concussion-Related</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrsec.com/2011/03/ums-mackey-now-says-his-speech-issues-arent-concussion-related/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/03/ums-mackey-now-says-his-speech-issues-arent-concussion-related/</link>
	<description>Up to the minute SEC football and basketball news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 06:01:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: johnmrsec</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/03/ums-mackey-now-says-his-speech-issues-arent-concussion-related/comment-page-1/#comment-11367</link>
		<dc:creator>johnmrsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/03/ums-mackey-now-says-his-speech-issues-arent-concussion-related/#comment-11367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[marcus black... 
 
No, if Randall Mackey told a reporter that he was uncomfortable talking about his speech impediment and the reporter took him to task for not talking, THEN the reporter would be a heartless weasel. 
 
No one called out Kyle Veazey.  Read the story and you&#039;ll see that we make it clear we don&#039;t think he&#039;d have pushed Mackey if Mackey had just been honest with him. 
 
As for why we included this story, well, when a player says he has a speech impediments caused by a concussion, it&#039;s newsworthy... as in: Why is he still playing?  So when he then comes back and say he wasn&#039;t impacted by a concussion -- which makes the school look better -- it&#039;s also news. 
 
Glad to know you got my point. 
 
John ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marcus black&#8230; </p>
<p>No, if Randall Mackey told a reporter that he was uncomfortable talking about his speech impediment and the reporter took him to task for not talking, THEN the reporter would be a heartless weasel. </p>
<p>No one called out Kyle Veazey.  Read the story and you&#039;ll see that we make it clear we don&#039;t think he&#039;d have pushed Mackey if Mackey had just been honest with him. </p>
<p>As for why we included this story, well, when a player says he has a speech impediments caused by a concussion, it&#039;s newsworthy&#8230; as in: Why is he still playing?  So when he then comes back and say he wasn&#039;t impacted by a concussion &#8212; which makes the school look better &#8212; it&#039;s also news. </p>
<p>Glad to know you got my point. </p>
<p>John </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcus black</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/03/ums-mackey-now-says-his-speech-issues-arent-concussion-related/comment-page-1/#comment-11359</link>
		<dc:creator>marcus black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/03/ums-mackey-now-says-his-speech-issues-arent-concussion-related/#comment-11359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So if a reporter writes about Mackey&#039;s speech problem he is a heartless weasel? What does that then make a guy who runs a website who re-reports the guys problem and calls out any other reporter who writes about these personal problems? 
  I get your point, but why even feel the need to propagate this so called news even more than it already has been spread? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if a reporter writes about Mackey&#039;s speech problem he is a heartless weasel? What does that then make a guy who runs a website who re-reports the guys problem and calls out any other reporter who writes about these personal problems?<br />
  I get your point, but why even feel the need to propagate this so called news even more than it already has been spread? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
