<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NCAA Wants To Talk To Sheridan About &#8220;Bagman&#8221; Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrsec.com/2011/08/ncaa-wants-to-talk-to-sheridan-about-bagman-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/08/ncaa-wants-to-talk-to-sheridan-about-bagman-comments/</link>
	<description>Up to the minute SEC football and basketball news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 05:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: AllTideUp</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/08/ncaa-wants-to-talk-to-sheridan-about-bagman-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-15960</link>
		<dc:creator>AllTideUp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 21:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/08/ncaa-wants-to-talk-to-sheridan-about-bagman-comments/#comment-15960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think the NCAA would be looking for him to back-up his story.  If he is spreading lies then they certainly wouldn&#039;t like that, but they don&#039;t have any authority to question him.  I&#039;m not real sure they would be worried about Sheridan anyway as what he says will have no effect on the investigation or any punishment.  I think it would be more likely that if the NCAA was trying to discredit Sheridan that they would simply make a public statement. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t think the NCAA would be looking for him to back-up his story.  If he is spreading lies then they certainly wouldn&#039;t like that, but they don&#039;t have any authority to question him.  I&#039;m not real sure they would be worried about Sheridan anyway as what he says will have no effect on the investigation or any punishment.  I think it would be more likely that if the NCAA was trying to discredit Sheridan that they would simply make a public statement. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ViciousDawg</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/08/ncaa-wants-to-talk-to-sheridan-about-bagman-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-15946</link>
		<dc:creator>ViciousDawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/08/ncaa-wants-to-talk-to-sheridan-about-bagman-comments/#comment-15946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex, I have to agree. I have seen better faces in a casket. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, I have to agree. I have seen better faces in a casket. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ViciousDawg</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/08/ncaa-wants-to-talk-to-sheridan-about-bagman-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-15945</link>
		<dc:creator>ViciousDawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/08/ncaa-wants-to-talk-to-sheridan-about-bagman-comments/#comment-15945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If he had something he should just come out with it. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he had something he should just come out with it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/08/ncaa-wants-to-talk-to-sheridan-about-bagman-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-15943</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/08/ncaa-wants-to-talk-to-sheridan-about-bagman-comments/#comment-15943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NCAA has no authority over Sheridan whatsoever.  He doesn&#039;t have to talk to them if he doesn&#039;t want to.  If all he had was &quot;nonsense,&quot; he wouldn&#039;t even talk to them.  Sheridan works for USA Today, not a worthless site like SportsbyBrooks, so he has a reputation to uphold.  Clearly he has something. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NCAA has no authority over Sheridan whatsoever.  He doesn&#039;t have to talk to them if he doesn&#039;t want to.  If all he had was &quot;nonsense,&quot; he wouldn&#039;t even talk to them.  Sheridan works for USA Today, not a worthless site like SportsbyBrooks, so he has a reputation to uphold.  Clearly he has something. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/08/ncaa-wants-to-talk-to-sheridan-about-bagman-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-15941</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/08/ncaa-wants-to-talk-to-sheridan-about-bagman-comments/#comment-15941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[his face really creeps me out.  hard to believe someone is actually THAT ugly ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>his face really creeps me out.  hard to believe someone is actually THAT ugly </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
