<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conference Realignment Isn&#8217;t Evil&#8230; It&#8217;s Evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/</link>
	<description>Up to the minute SEC football and basketball news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 22:08:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Homepage &#124; MrSEC</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-72084</link>
		<dc:creator>Homepage &#124; MrSEC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 14:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-72084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] hissy fits regarding Texas A&amp;M&#8217;s move to the SEC &#8212; we penned a little piece called: &#8220;Conference Realignment Isn&#8217;t Evil&#8230; It&#8217;s Evolution.&#8221;  In it we showed that the current twists and turns and shifts and moves were really nothing new. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hissy fits regarding Texas A&amp;M&#8217;s move to the SEC &#8212; we penned a little piece called: &#8220;Conference Realignment Isn&#8217;t Evil&#8230; It&#8217;s Evolution.&#8221;  In it we showed that the current twists and turns and shifts and moves were really nothing new. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kitchen tv</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-54158</link>
		<dc:creator>kitchen tv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 11:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-54158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;kitchen tv...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Alabama &#124; MrSEC.com[...]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>kitchen tv&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Alabama | MrSEC.com[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting. My very best site. - online igi</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-36714</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting. My very best site. - online igi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 17:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-36714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Interesting. My very best site. - online igi...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Alabama &#124; MrSEC.com[...]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Interesting. My very best site. &#8211; online igi&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Alabama | MrSEC.com[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conference Calls</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-24217</link>
		<dc:creator>Conference Calls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 15:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-24217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Conference Calls...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Alabama &#124; MrSEC.com[...]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Conference Calls&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Alabama | MrSEC.com[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-19788</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-19788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is true.  If ECU &quot;had a ride&quot; they would be awesome. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is true.  If ECU &quot;had a ride&quot; they would be awesome. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alabama &#124; MrSEC.com</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-19325</link>
		<dc:creator>Alabama &#124; MrSEC.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-19325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] are driving the current college football expansion push.  As we noted a couple of weeks ago, conference realignment isn&#8217;t evil, it&#8217;s evolution.  And we seem to finally be arriving at the final stage of a move that began way back in 1984.Below [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are driving the current college football expansion push.  As we noted a couple of weeks ago, conference realignment isn&#8217;t evil, it&#8217;s evolution.  And we seem to finally be arriving at the final stage of a move that began way back in 1984.Below [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-19199</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-19199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I forgot to mention, I&#039;m a UNC fan, but follow ECU everytime they are on TV - pretty much like everyone else in NC.  We all root for these guys, they are the underdogs that deliver big upsets.  Put these guys in a conference where they can recruit top level talent and the sky is the limit.  On a side note, Playboy Magazine has regularly ranked ECU as the top party school in the nation since the 1990s. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to mention, I&#039;m a UNC fan, but follow ECU everytime they are on TV &#8211; pretty much like everyone else in NC.  We all root for these guys, they are the underdogs that deliver big upsets.  Put these guys in a conference where they can recruit top level talent and the sky is the limit.  On a side note, Playboy Magazine has regularly ranked ECU as the top party school in the nation since the 1990s. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-19198</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-19198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will someone please mention East Carolina University as a quality SEC expansion candidate.  They are expanding their stadium to 60,000 over the next 2 years.  The town has a population of 75,000 and have an attendance average of 50,000 (that&#039;s the current capacity).  They travel well and are SEC passionate about sports.  This would deliver the Raleigh market, some Charlotte market, and some Norfolk, VA market.  Raleigh is the 25th largest market.  If the SEC is looking to break into North Carolina, this is a football first school, unlike the ACC schools.  How realistic would an ECU addition be for the SEC? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will someone please mention East Carolina University as a quality SEC expansion candidate.  They are expanding their stadium to 60,000 over the next 2 years.  The town has a population of 75,000 and have an attendance average of 50,000 (that&#039;s the current capacity).  They travel well and are SEC passionate about sports.  This would deliver the Raleigh market, some Charlotte market, and some Norfolk, VA market.  Raleigh is the 25th largest market.  If the SEC is looking to break into North Carolina, this is a football first school, unlike the ACC schools.  How realistic would an ECU addition be for the SEC? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18542</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Phelps gets to compete in the Olympics and stil do endorsements.The Olympics woke up to the 21st century in the 1990&#039;s.Still waiting for the NCAA to do the same. If they dont someday they wont  be residing over college football. The largest and best backed 60 teams will break off and do their own thing. Some lawyers will figure out a loop hole or  a different way to designate or spin off  the football teams to get around having to pay the school&#039;s girls volleyball team. I say let the fans &quot;donate&quot; or gift  the players individually   on their own and the girls volley ball cant get in between a private transaction anyway. Let the big schools get  together get rid of the NCAA and their hypocrisy and play ball. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Phelps gets to compete in the Olympics and stil do endorsements.The Olympics woke up to the 21st century in the 1990&#039;s.Still waiting for the NCAA to do the same. If they dont someday they wont  be residing over college football. The largest and best backed 60 teams will break off and do their own thing. Some lawyers will figure out a loop hole or  a different way to designate or spin off  the football teams to get around having to pay the school&#039;s girls volleyball team. I say let the fans &quot;donate&quot; or gift  the players individually   on their own and the girls volley ball cant get in between a private transaction anyway. Let the big schools get  together get rid of the NCAA and their hypocrisy and play ball. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18541</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NCAA  gastapo tactics on certain coaches and certain schools,playing favorites,and makeit up arbitrarily as they go. poor kids suffer that cant buy a shirt or take their girlfriend out while the coach and players make millions. DONT give me &quot; they get their school paid as compensation&quot; crap.They dont have time for a job either between classes,practice,meetings, and road trips that have an NFL iteneriary with hotels and 1am plane rides. Besides if you get job you get accused of violations just like the &quot;job&quot; Brian Bosworth had watching an oil rig for thousands a month(check out  his book). Let&#039;s get real.  Get rid of the Ncaa. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NCAA  gastapo tactics on certain coaches and certain schools,playing favorites,and makeit up arbitrarily as they go. poor kids suffer that cant buy a shirt or take their girlfriend out while the coach and players make millions. DONT give me &quot; they get their school paid as compensation&quot; crap.They dont have time for a job either between classes,practice,meetings, and road trips that have an NFL iteneriary with hotels and 1am plane rides. Besides if you get job you get accused of violations just like the &quot;job&quot; Brian Bosworth had watching an oil rig for thousands a month(check out  his book). Let&#039;s get real.  Get rid of the Ncaa. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDO</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18514</link>
		<dc:creator>JDO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the top 2 articles, and arguably the best, I have read on the TAMU/SEC issue, great job.  I have this sight bookmarked now as my GoTo sight for SEC Expansion news and TAMU joing the SEC. 
 
Qustion: now that things have slowed down a bit with the Baylor Kamakazie manuever, what now?  Any timetable projections?  At the very least, is there any certainty left that TAMU will definitely be joining the SEC, just a matter of time? 
 
Gig &#039;Em 
Fightin Texas Aggie Class of 1989 
Whoop! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the top 2 articles, and arguably the best, I have read on the TAMU/SEC issue, great job.  I have this sight bookmarked now as my GoTo sight for SEC Expansion news and TAMU joing the SEC. </p>
<p>Qustion: now that things have slowed down a bit with the Baylor Kamakazie manuever, what now?  Any timetable projections?  At the very least, is there any certainty left that TAMU will definitely be joining the SEC, just a matter of time? </p>
<p>Gig &#039;Em<br />
Fightin Texas Aggie Class of 1989<br />
Whoop! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18513</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice article.  Its good to get a better perspective on realignment.  But with that said, it does seem to gloss over the negatives of change.  Sure college football survived without OU and NU playing every year.  But I think the sport is a bit worse off as a result.  Losing a classic matchup that came about from two teams competing for conference championships (with national implications) for decades is something that can&#039;t be replaced with Nebraska - Colorado or a Penn State - Michigan State &#039;rivalry&#039;. 
 
The point is that sometimes what is gained can&#039;t replace what was lost.  It doesn&#039;t mean the end to the sport, but little by little it might chip away at what makes the sport so important to its fans.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.  Its good to get a better perspective on realignment.  But with that said, it does seem to gloss over the negatives of change.  Sure college football survived without OU and NU playing every year.  But I think the sport is a bit worse off as a result.  Losing a classic matchup that came about from two teams competing for conference championships (with national implications) for decades is something that can&#039;t be replaced with Nebraska &#8211; Colorado or a Penn State &#8211; Michigan State &#039;rivalry&#039;. </p>
<p>The point is that sometimes what is gained can&#039;t replace what was lost.  It doesn&#039;t mean the end to the sport, but little by little it might chip away at what makes the sport so important to its fans.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hangtime79</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18449</link>
		<dc:creator>hangtime79</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UH had problems with the NCAA, SMU was/is still trying to recover from the death penatly, TCU and Baylor you would have called it a toss-up if you were looking at it from football perspective so Baylor used its political connections to freeze out TCU. If it had been a TCU alum as governor maybe we&#039;re having the reverse conversation today. Baylor wasn&#039;t the one who killed the SWC, yes Baylor did jump over and push TCU to get out, but make no mistake UT and TAMU put the bullet in the SWC. At that point, it was killed or be killed.  
 
Also, as to those who say there was room for three. The Big 12 wasn&#039;t going to be the Big 14 - that would have meant one of the three northern schools, KSU, KU, or Mizzou, becoming a Big 12 south school and that was not going to happen as all three consider the others deep rivals like Texas and OU. The Big 12 worked because OU and Texas wanted to play each other every year and OU wanted to be in Texas as much as possible for recruiting purposes (sound familiar as to one of the reasons the SEC wants to be there).  
 
Yes, as I stated the Aggies are gone from Big 12 that much is abundantly clear. The Aggies are just crazy enough to make all of their other sports sit out a year; they are that far down the line. However, this not about the Aggies - its about millions of dollars in revenue per year for Baylor, ISU, KU, and KSU and what OU wants. Once OU and UT get this figured out - the Big 12 will survive and hopefully will never have to talk about realignment ever again. 
 
 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UH had problems with the NCAA, SMU was/is still trying to recover from the death penatly, TCU and Baylor you would have called it a toss-up if you were looking at it from football perspective so Baylor used its political connections to freeze out TCU. If it had been a TCU alum as governor maybe we&#039;re having the reverse conversation today. Baylor wasn&#039;t the one who killed the SWC, yes Baylor did jump over and push TCU to get out, but make no mistake UT and TAMU put the bullet in the SWC. At that point, it was killed or be killed.  </p>
<p>Also, as to those who say there was room for three. The Big 12 wasn&#039;t going to be the Big 14 &#8211; that would have meant one of the three northern schools, KSU, KU, or Mizzou, becoming a Big 12 south school and that was not going to happen as all three consider the others deep rivals like Texas and OU. The Big 12 worked because OU and Texas wanted to play each other every year and OU wanted to be in Texas as much as possible for recruiting purposes (sound familiar as to one of the reasons the SEC wants to be there).  </p>
<p>Yes, as I stated the Aggies are gone from Big 12 that much is abundantly clear. The Aggies are just crazy enough to make all of their other sports sit out a year; they are that far down the line. However, this not about the Aggies &#8211; its about millions of dollars in revenue per year for Baylor, ISU, KU, and KSU and what OU wants. Once OU and UT get this figured out &#8211; the Big 12 will survive and hopefully will never have to talk about realignment ever again. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hangtime79</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18447</link>
		<dc:creator>hangtime79</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed. A&amp;M will be either independent for a year then go to the SEC (nullifies any possible damages claim by Baylor and ISU) or more likely Mom and Dad (OU and UT) sit down at the table and work this out. As long as they both want a conference there will be a Big 12 conference. Once that is done, TAMU will run into the SEC&#039;s arms unencumbered and we will put the last two summers of realignment, hopefully behind us. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. A&amp;M will be either independent for a year then go to the SEC (nullifies any possible damages claim by Baylor and ISU) or more likely Mom and Dad (OU and UT) sit down at the table and work this out. As long as they both want a conference there will be a Big 12 conference. Once that is done, TAMU will run into the SEC&#039;s arms unencumbered and we will put the last two summers of realignment, hopefully behind us. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaywcjr</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18441</link>
		<dc:creator>jaywcjr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 18:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So for the above revenue losses to be accurate, you have to assume the enrollment assumptions are valid.  IF SMU, TCU, Rice and UH lost 30% of its student body when they left the SWC, then I might agree but I don&#039;t believe that is the case.  Another huge hole in this argument is the state of Texas&#039; population growth.  This &quot;analysis&quot; assumes that Baylor cannot get any additional students from the state of Texas&#039; growing population. 
 
The math adds up if you accept the basic premise however, the starting assumptions are completely bogus making the premise dubious at best. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So for the above revenue losses to be accurate, you have to assume the enrollment assumptions are valid.  IF SMU, TCU, Rice and UH lost 30% of its student body when they left the SWC, then I might agree but I don&#039;t believe that is the case.  Another huge hole in this argument is the state of Texas&#039; population growth.  This &quot;analysis&quot; assumes that Baylor cannot get any additional students from the state of Texas&#039; growing population. </p>
<p>The math adds up if you accept the basic premise however, the starting assumptions are completely bogus making the premise dubious at best. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happy</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18439</link>
		<dc:creator>happy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a shame that TCU etal did not feel the say way Baylor feels.  Instead, when Baylor made sure they used political clout to force their way, and kicked TCU etal to the ground, TCU etal regrouped and figured out a way to make their schools more marketable and survived.  Good luck Baylor, the Aggies are gone in 2012, whether Baylor likes it or not.  Perhaps texas u will pony up some of their record breaking contract with espn.  Will that make you happy or will you continue to present yourself as a Christian based university, like you&#039;re doing now? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s a shame that TCU etal did not feel the say way Baylor feels.  Instead, when Baylor made sure they used political clout to force their way, and kicked TCU etal to the ground, TCU etal regrouped and figured out a way to make their schools more marketable and survived.  Good luck Baylor, the Aggies are gone in 2012, whether Baylor likes it or not.  Perhaps texas u will pony up some of their record breaking contract with espn.  Will that make you happy or will you continue to present yourself as a Christian based university, like you&#039;re doing now? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ESipN</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18438</link>
		<dc:creator>ESipN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good math.  However, A&amp;M is gone in June 2012. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good math.  However, A&amp;M is gone in June 2012. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlayOffPlease</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18389</link>
		<dc:creator>PlayOffPlease</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dude, the Aggies whine about their treatment in Lubbock, what the heck do you think will happen in Baton Rouge?  The Tech fans manage to get rowdy in a DRY COUNTY!  I don&#039;t think there&#039;s such a thing in the whole state of Louisiana.  Good Luck Aggie. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, the Aggies whine about their treatment in Lubbock, what the heck do you think will happen in Baton Rouge?  The Tech fans manage to get rowdy in a DRY COUNTY!  I don&#039;t think there&#039;s such a thing in the whole state of Louisiana.  Good Luck Aggie. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBloodTypo</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18379</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBloodTypo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a current student at A&amp;M. I appreciate y&#039;all&#039;s patience with this whole fiasco, and I can&#039;t wait to drive out to LSU or Bama to see a great game. 
 
Thanks, and Gig &#039;Em.  
 
:) ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m a current student at A&amp;M. I appreciate y&#039;all&#039;s patience with this whole fiasco, and I can&#039;t wait to drive out to LSU or Bama to see a great game. </p>
<p>Thanks, and Gig &#039;Em.<br />
  <img src='http://www.mrsec.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homepage &#124; MrSEC.com</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18360</link>
		<dc:creator>Homepage &#124; MrSEC.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 1. Conference Realignment Isn&#8217;t Evil&#8230;It&#8217;s Evolution [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1. Conference Realignment Isn&#8217;t Evil&#8230;It&#8217;s Evolution [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vp19</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18313</link>
		<dc:creator>vp19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 04:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would make more sense for the Big 12 remnants (probably Iowa State, Kansas State, Kansas and Baylor; possibly Missouri as well) to invite the Big East football members to join their league, creating a 14-member all-sports conference under the Big 12 banner (perhaps bringing in Brigham Young as member #14 if Missouri goes elsewhere). BCS officials would probably prefer this to having Big 12 members go to the Big East -- they want the Big East out of the football business so the basketball schools can&#039;t tag along in case the BCS conferences someday decide to split from the NCAA. 
 
Ultimately, the SEC, Big Ten and Pac will be the three top conferences, with 16 members each. The ACC and Big 12 will survive as second-tier leagues in reconstituted form, and Notre Dame will remain an independent. For political purposes, no current BCS member will be kicked out of the coalitiion. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would make more sense for the Big 12 remnants (probably Iowa State, Kansas State, Kansas and Baylor; possibly Missouri as well) to invite the Big East football members to join their league, creating a 14-member all-sports conference under the Big 12 banner (perhaps bringing in Brigham Young as member #14 if Missouri goes elsewhere). BCS officials would probably prefer this to having Big 12 members go to the Big East &#8212; they want the Big East out of the football business so the basketball schools can&#039;t tag along in case the BCS conferences someday decide to split from the NCAA. </p>
<p>Ultimately, the SEC, Big Ten and Pac will be the three top conferences, with 16 members each. The ACC and Big 12 will survive as second-tier leagues in reconstituted form, and Notre Dame will remain an independent. For political purposes, no current BCS member will be kicked out of the coalitiion. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamar Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18236</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamar Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Post was too long!  Here &#039;s the remainder. 
 
The ONE good thing that could happen in this is&#8230;&#8230; the Super conferences COULD organize a NEW ruling body to replace the NCAA.  This would eliminate the &#8217;favorites&#8217; that the NCAA has.   That&#8217;s not enough though&#8230;.. The Presidents of the FBS schools could do that NOW!  
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Post was too long!  Here &#039;s the remainder. </p>
<p>The ONE good thing that could happen in this is&hellip;&hellip; the Super conferences COULD organize a NEW ruling body to replace the NCAA.  This would eliminate the &rsquo;favorites&rsquo; that the NCAA has.   That&rsquo;s not enough though&hellip;.. The Presidents of the FBS schools could do that NOW!  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamar Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18235</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamar Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why stop at 14 or 16 teams, just go ahead and have 32 teams.  Name them ACFL and NCFL.  The American College Football League and the National College Football league.  College players can get an agent and negotiate contracts, colleges can trade students, and they can unionize and demand certain rules and conditions. 
 
There are limits, and college football is going beyond one of the limits if they expand to 14 or 16 teams..  Either the teams within a conference  will NOT play each other, or the number of games will have to be increased to accommodate  the increase in the number of teams. The SEC has to rotate (2) teams every year just to play all the teams in the &#8217;other&#8217; division every (3) or (4) years. College players ARE STUDENT ATHELETES!  They are NOT PROS. There are OTHER sports that college students play that are being crowded out now. A GOOD change would be to divide the 120 FBS (DIV-1A) teams into (10) 12 teams conferences and then devise a playoff that the fans were clamoring for earlier this year.  This would be a good change  That would give the BOWLS  games to put on each year. 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why stop at 14 or 16 teams, just go ahead and have 32 teams.  Name them ACFL and NCFL.  The American College Football League and the National College Football league.  College players can get an agent and negotiate contracts, colleges can trade students, and they can unionize and demand certain rules and conditions. </p>
<p>There are limits, and college football is going beyond one of the limits if they expand to 14 or 16 teams..  Either the teams within a conference  will NOT play each other, or the number of games will have to be increased to accommodate  the increase in the number of teams. The SEC has to rotate (2) teams every year just to play all the teams in the &rsquo;other&rsquo; division every (3) or (4) years. College players ARE STUDENT ATHELETES!  They are NOT PROS. There are OTHER sports that college students play that are being crowded out now. A GOOD change would be to divide the 120 FBS (DIV-1A) teams into (10) 12 teams conferences and then devise a playoff that the fans were clamoring for earlier this year.  This would be a good change  That would give the BOWLS  games to put on each year. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GHB</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18067</link>
		<dc:creator>GHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahh no that is the latest false information. A&amp;m never signed any ten year deal. Please show me the copy. Dr Loftin made it very clear that he was committed to the Big XII &#039;as in it&#039;s present state&quot; and there were on going concerns about Beebe&#039;s ability to fulfill their commitment to A&amp;M. a commitment that was based on a different deal other then the Fox deal. That deal has still not come in to being. In any case  there is no contract. Please show me a copy of it, LINK?  Just regurgitating the company line doesn&#039;t make it the truth!  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh no that is the latest false information. A&amp;m never signed any ten year deal. Please show me the copy. Dr Loftin made it very clear that he was committed to the Big XII &#039;as in it&#039;s present state&quot; and there were on going concerns about Beebe&#039;s ability to fulfill their commitment to A&amp;M. a commitment that was based on a different deal other then the Fox deal. That deal has still not come in to being. In any case  there is no contract. Please show me a copy of it, LINK?  Just regurgitating the company line doesn&#039;t make it the truth!  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Dooley</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18016</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Dooley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TAMU gave up its freedom to leave the Big 12 when it signed a 10 year deal last year. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TAMU gave up its freedom to leave the Big 12 when it signed a 10 year deal last year. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GHB</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-18001</link>
		<dc:creator>GHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-18001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hangtime79. 
 
Please explain why Texas A&amp;M is responsible for Baylor at all. Baylor has been feasting at the table of the A&amp;M&#039;s, OU&#039;s and UT&#039;s and to a lesser degree, Tech and OSU for the entire existence in the Big XII that was forced by the Baylor alum Gov. Ann Richardson. 
 
Secondly why threaten A&amp;M? In reality A&amp;M has nothing to do with conference instability and Baylor knows it as does the rest of the Big 12. It is the reason that everyone did originally sign off on  A&amp;Ms withdrawl from the Big XII and it&#039;s soliciting of the SEC. It wasn&#039;t until Baylor heard rumblings from OU and others about &#039;checking out options&#039; that Baylor launhed it&#039;s attack and threat and at who. OU?, UT? KNOW A&amp;M?!??!??! Really.  
 
Thirdly, the TV contract is with the Big XII and the only reason it even happened is because A&amp;M stepped up and said they did not want to go to the PAC. Thus giving the BIg XII a chance to renegotiate a contract with Fox. Furthermore do you really think contract would of been anywhere near what it is if A&amp;M was not there? So Baylor once again is attempting to hold A&amp;M hostage to continue to feed them when they have brought nothing to that table themselves. Even then there is no signed contract of commitment for this new Big 12-2.  Dr. Loftin made it very clear that his commitment to the conference was bracketed with this very important statement, &quot;as in it&#039;s present condition&quot;.. So when UT started pushing the envelope what did Baylor do? Nothing, nothing at all, nor did anyone else in the Big  XII. 
 
4. Finally it has been publicly stated that A&amp;M&#039;s removal from the conference would not  lead to it&#039;s dissolution. So now Baylor threatens to sue the SEC and A&amp;M for that very thing? Really? What Baylor has done here is not only legally weak it is wicked. They have attacked the one party in this who not only held the conference together last year but has done everything above board and in the light all the way through.  Why don&#039;t they threaten to sue tu, OU or the Pac if they go. What does A&amp;M have anything to do with this at all!    ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hangtime79. </p>
<p>Please explain why Texas A&amp;M is responsible for Baylor at all. Baylor has been feasting at the table of the A&amp;M&#039;s, OU&#039;s and UT&#039;s and to a lesser degree, Tech and OSU for the entire existence in the Big XII that was forced by the Baylor alum Gov. Ann Richardson. </p>
<p>Secondly why threaten A&amp;M? In reality A&amp;M has nothing to do with conference instability and Baylor knows it as does the rest of the Big 12. It is the reason that everyone did originally sign off on  A&amp;Ms withdrawl from the Big XII and it&#039;s soliciting of the SEC. It wasn&#039;t until Baylor heard rumblings from OU and others about &#039;checking out options&#039; that Baylor launhed it&#039;s attack and threat and at who. OU?, UT? KNOW A&amp;M?!??!??! Really.  </p>
<p>Thirdly, the TV contract is with the Big XII and the only reason it even happened is because A&amp;M stepped up and said they did not want to go to the PAC. Thus giving the BIg XII a chance to renegotiate a contract with Fox. Furthermore do you really think contract would of been anywhere near what it is if A&amp;M was not there? So Baylor once again is attempting to hold A&amp;M hostage to continue to feed them when they have brought nothing to that table themselves. Even then there is no signed contract of commitment for this new Big 12-2.  Dr. Loftin made it very clear that his commitment to the conference was bracketed with this very important statement, &quot;as in it&#039;s present condition&quot;.. So when UT started pushing the envelope what did Baylor do? Nothing, nothing at all, nor did anyone else in the Big  XII. </p>
<p>4. Finally it has been publicly stated that A&amp;M&#039;s removal from the conference would not  lead to it&#039;s dissolution. So now Baylor threatens to sue the SEC and A&amp;M for that very thing? Really? What Baylor has done here is not only legally weak it is wicked. They have attacked the one party in this who not only held the conference together last year but has done everything above board and in the light all the way through.  Why don&#039;t they threaten to sue tu, OU or the Pac if they go. What does A&amp;M have anything to do with this at all!    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tradeassociation</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17988</link>
		<dc:creator>tradeassociation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expanding on above, the ACC (unlike the SEC now) actually did attempt to kill off the Big East, or at least do so as an AQ league. The ACC publicly, unapologetically announced their intentions. They put out press releases on how they were going to add 3 of the Big East&#039;s strongest programs, and then go to the BCS leaders and TV networks with the case that the Big East no longer merited an automatic bid. That would increase the number of automatic bids, and according to their calculations, result in the ACC getting two BCS bids almost every year. The increased revenue to the ACC from the at-large bids would be used to help pay for the cost of expansion. The ACC even predicted how many BCS bids they were going to get (based, of course on their belief that Miami and FSU would remain powerhouses)! When Mike Tranghese announced his attention to sue the ACC, he got hammered in the press over it, but it had its desired effect: the ACC backed off their intention of pressuring the BCS to revoke the Big East&#039;s automatic bid. (The Big East was still able to win a $5 million verdict against the ACC even though they never lost their AQ status and TV contracts merely because the ACC tried to do it. Had the Big East actually lost their AQ status, the verdict would have been much larger).    
   
Thanks to the Big East&#039;s successful &quot;struggle for life&quot;, their being willing to exist as a platypus (an &quot;east coast&quot;conference with teams in Illinois, Indiana, Ohio and Texas) rather than gracefully accept being a dodo (as the national media &quot;encouraged&quot; them to do) they are going to outlive the Big 12. Which means that no matter what happens to the Big 12, Kansas basketball will have an AQ conference to go to. That is a good thing and not a bad thing, right? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expanding on above, the ACC (unlike the SEC now) actually did attempt to kill off the Big East, or at least do so as an AQ league. The ACC publicly, unapologetically announced their intentions. They put out press releases on how they were going to add 3 of the Big East&#039;s strongest programs, and then go to the BCS leaders and TV networks with the case that the Big East no longer merited an automatic bid. That would increase the number of automatic bids, and according to their calculations, result in the ACC getting two BCS bids almost every year. The increased revenue to the ACC from the at-large bids would be used to help pay for the cost of expansion. The ACC even predicted how many BCS bids they were going to get (based, of course on their belief that Miami and FSU would remain powerhouses)! When Mike Tranghese announced his attention to sue the ACC, he got hammered in the press over it, but it had its desired effect: the ACC backed off their intention of pressuring the BCS to revoke the Big East&#039;s automatic bid. (The Big East was still able to win a $5 million verdict against the ACC even though they never lost their AQ status and TV contracts merely because the ACC tried to do it. Had the Big East actually lost their AQ status, the verdict would have been much larger).    </p>
<p>Thanks to the Big East&#039;s successful &quot;struggle for life&quot;, their being willing to exist as a platypus (an &quot;east coast&quot;conference with teams in Illinois, Indiana, Ohio and Texas) rather than gracefully accept being a dodo (as the national media &quot;encouraged&quot; them to do) they are going to outlive the Big 12. Which means that no matter what happens to the Big 12, Kansas basketball will have an AQ conference to go to. That is a good thing and not a bad thing, right? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShannyDeridan</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17981</link>
		<dc:creator>ShannyDeridan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[not so much the SEC though  
 
teams out: Tulane, Sewanee, G Tech  
 
teams in: Arkansas, South Carolina  
 
So you could argue that the SEC teams that matter, the ones that make the SEC what it is have all been there since the beginning of the conference, That core of teams has been there since the beginning. Cant say that about a lot of other conferences  
 
I think thats why there is more SEC pride than there is for other conferences, because for the most part its been the same 10 teams for 75 years, which is why the traditions and rivalries here are unlike anywhere else in college football ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not so much the SEC though  </p>
<p>teams out: Tulane, Sewanee, G Tech  </p>
<p>teams in: Arkansas, South Carolina  </p>
<p>So you could argue that the SEC teams that matter, the ones that make the SEC what it is have all been there since the beginning of the conference, That core of teams has been there since the beginning. Cant say that about a lot of other conferences  </p>
<p>I think thats why there is more SEC pride than there is for other conferences, because for the most part its been the same 10 teams for 75 years, which is why the traditions and rivalries here are unlike anywhere else in college football </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tradeassociation</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17980</link>
		<dc:creator>tradeassociation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the full title of Darwin&#039;s book is &quot;On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.&quot;  
 
The Big East survived the struggle for life, no?  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the full title of Darwin&#039;s book is &quot;On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.&quot;  </p>
<p>The Big East survived the struggle for life, no?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShannyDeridan</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17976</link>
		<dc:creator>ShannyDeridan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you tell me that its Evolution... well you know 
 
we all want to change the world ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you tell me that its Evolution&#8230; well you know </p>
<p>we all want to change the world </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnmrsec</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17977</link>
		<dc:creator>johnmrsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sparty_Cyclone... 
 
No problem.  Wouldn&#039;t expect to write anything without someone quibbling. 
 
We stated that these were major conference moves.  When one conference loses a team, another conference gains a team.  But let&#039;s cut the number in half -- even though that&#039;s not completely accurate.  That would still mean one team would move every 2 years (on average)... rather than every year.   
 
Our point was that teams have been coming and going and traditions changing for years. 
 
Thanks for reading the site, 
John ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sparty_Cyclone&#8230; </p>
<p>No problem.  Wouldn&#039;t expect to write anything without someone quibbling. </p>
<p>We stated that these were major conference moves.  When one conference loses a team, another conference gains a team.  But let&#039;s cut the number in half &#8212; even though that&#039;s not completely accurate.  That would still mean one team would move every 2 years (on average)&#8230; rather than every year.   </p>
<p>Our point was that teams have been coming and going and traditions changing for years. </p>
<p>Thanks for reading the site,<br />
John </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnmrsec</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17975</link>
		<dc:creator>johnmrsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tradeassociation...  
  
Since you&#039;re going to defend Baylor under every post on this site, you might want to buy a sense of humor.  That way you can do your spinning on the serious stuff and not on the funny stuff like the post above.  
  
And for the record, I grew up the son of a Baptist minister.  
  
John ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tradeassociation&#8230;  </p>
<p>Since you&#039;re going to defend Baylor under every post on this site, you might want to buy a sense of humor.  That way you can do your spinning on the serious stuff and not on the funny stuff like the post above.  </p>
<p>And for the record, I grew up the son of a Baptist minister.  </p>
<p>John </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShannyDeridan</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17970</link>
		<dc:creator>ShannyDeridan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEC has been relatively stable  
 
10 of the 12 schools were founding members!! Thats actually not much change at all considering its been 75+ years 
 
very interesting article ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEC has been relatively stable  </p>
<p>10 of the 12 schools were founding members!! Thats actually not much change at all considering its been 75+ years </p>
<p>very interesting article </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tradeassociation</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17965</link>
		<dc:creator>tradeassociation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pardon me, but Baylor teaches evolution (among other things). Baylor is a Baptist school, but not a fundamentalist or evangelical one. In any event, this is a sports issue, not a religious one. If you want to make it into a religious issue, then go criticize the Pac-10 for their &quot;absolutely no religious schools&quot; (no matter the denomination or religion) stance, which is why they have rejected longtime aspirant BYU so many times, and ultimately wound up taking Utah instead (despite BYU having more tradition and a much larger regional and national following).  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon me, but Baylor teaches evolution (among other things). Baylor is a Baptist school, but not a fundamentalist or evangelical one. In any event, this is a sports issue, not a religious one. If you want to make it into a religious issue, then go criticize the Pac-10 for their &quot;absolutely no religious schools&quot; (no matter the denomination or religion) stance, which is why they have rejected longtime aspirant BYU so many times, and ultimately wound up taking Utah instead (despite BYU having more tradition and a much larger regional and national following).  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparty_Cyclone</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17955</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparty_Cyclone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article - one of the best I&#039;ve read on the subject.  One small quibble, though.  Most of these changes are double-counted.  For example, Boston College&#039;s switch in 2005 is counted against both the Big East and the ACC.  But the basic premise is sound - the only constant is change. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article &#8211; one of the best I&#039;ve read on the subject.  One small quibble, though.  Most of these changes are double-counted.  For example, Boston College&#039;s switch in 2005 is counted against both the Big East and the ACC.  But the basic premise is sound &#8211; the only constant is change. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17953</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is just awesome!!!!!!! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is just awesome!!!!!!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnmrsec</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17906</link>
		<dc:creator>johnmrsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 06:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hangtime79... 
 
I appreciate you reading, but that wasn&#039;t the topic of the above piece.  We&#039;re talking about the incredible overreaction to the process.  Baylor&#039;s lawsuit wasn&#039;t really mentioned. 
 
John ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hangtime79&#8230; </p>
<p>I appreciate you reading, but that wasn&#039;t the topic of the above piece.  We&#039;re talking about the incredible overreaction to the process.  Baylor&#039;s lawsuit wasn&#039;t really mentioned. </p>
<p>John </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnmrsec</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17904</link>
		<dc:creator>johnmrsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 06:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Sills... 
 
Best line I&#039;ve read all day. 
 
John ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Sills&#8230; </p>
<p>Best line I&#039;ve read all day. </p>
<p>John </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alabama &#124; MrSEC.com</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17903</link>
		<dc:creator>Alabama &#124; MrSEC.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 06:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Square.&#8221;  Uh, yeah.  That&#8217;s a fair comparison.  (Anyone need further proof that the anti-expansion crowd can&#8217;t make their argument without wildly exaggerating?)9.  Gary Parish of CBSSports.com says Baylor is both desperate and right at the same time.10.  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Square.&#8221;  Uh, yeah.  That&#8217;s a fair comparison.  (Anyone need further proof that the anti-expansion crowd can&#8217;t make their argument without wildly exaggerating?)9.  Gary Parish of CBSSports.com says Baylor is both desperate and right at the same time.10.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sills</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17896</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 05:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Baptists don&#039;t believe in evolution ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baptists don&#039;t believe in evolution </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hangtime79</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17897</link>
		<dc:creator>hangtime79</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 05:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also posted this at Houston Chronicle today: It&#039;s not about athletics its about enrollment 
 
BTW, if Boren doesn&#8217;t shoot his mouth off last Friday about leaving for the Pac-12 &#8211; Baylor probably signs off. Once TAMU&#8217;s leaving starts the dominoes, Baylor is going to stop you in anyway it can. 
 
So this about two things &#8211; athletic dollars and enrollment AQ vs non-AQ. The athletic dollars we know call it about $10MM. The real money though is in enrollment. 
 
The key is the assumption of how much AQ vs non-AQ enrollment loss is for Baylor. My source tells me the scenarios used were between 15% and 33% for Baylor going to a non-AQ. Type in whatever you want but quite a few young people choose their school based partially on athletic conference. 
 
Now the math: 
 
Best Case Scenario 
Baylor loses 5% of their new undergraduate population going forward 12,500 x 5% = 625. 
Current tuition and fees are $38,279, assume Baylor students pay ~40% of that $16,000. 
 
Enrollment Loss: -625 x $16000 = -$10,000,000 
Athletics Loss: -$10,000,000 
= -$20,000,000 
 
Now let&#8217;s do worst case scenario: 
Both Baylor grad and undergrad lost 25% of 15,000 = 15000 x 25% = 3750 
Assume Baylor students pay ~50% of that $20,000. 
 
Enrollment Loss: -3750 x $20000 = -$75,000,000 
Athletics Loss: -$10,000,000 
= -$85,000,000 
 
This does not take into account future loss of alumni donations, research grants, rising price of tuition, etc., etc. Throw in your own numbers but that&#8217;s the equation Baylor is facing and the reason Baylor will not let TAMU go and are more then happy to take 100 years worth of Aggie hate. 
 
Also, those numbers are probably what the SEC is most afraid of in terms of a lawsuit. Baylor may only have 5% chance of winning the lawsuit, but that lawsuit is going to start at roughly 1 billion. =PV(.10,100,100,000,000) x .05 
Expected Value = -$50,000,000 
 
Thus I come back too, if TAMU wants Baylor&#8217;s sign-off on its move to the SEC then its in A&amp;Ms best interest to help find Baylor find a spot otherwise we are going to all be here for awhile. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also posted this at Houston Chronicle today: It&#039;s not about athletics its about enrollment </p>
<p>BTW, if Boren doesn&rsquo;t shoot his mouth off last Friday about leaving for the Pac-12 &ndash; Baylor probably signs off. Once TAMU&rsquo;s leaving starts the dominoes, Baylor is going to stop you in anyway it can. </p>
<p>So this about two things &ndash; athletic dollars and enrollment AQ vs non-AQ. The athletic dollars we know call it about $10MM. The real money though is in enrollment. </p>
<p>The key is the assumption of how much AQ vs non-AQ enrollment loss is for Baylor. My source tells me the scenarios used were between 15% and 33% for Baylor going to a non-AQ. Type in whatever you want but quite a few young people choose their school based partially on athletic conference. </p>
<p>Now the math: </p>
<p>Best Case Scenario<br />
Baylor loses 5% of their new undergraduate population going forward 12,500 x 5% = 625.<br />
Current tuition and fees are $38,279, assume Baylor students pay ~40% of that $16,000. </p>
<p>Enrollment Loss: -625 x $16000 = -$10,000,000<br />
Athletics Loss: -$10,000,000<br />
= -$20,000,000 </p>
<p>Now let&rsquo;s do worst case scenario:<br />
Both Baylor grad and undergrad lost 25% of 15,000 = 15000 x 25% = 3750<br />
Assume Baylor students pay ~50% of that $20,000. </p>
<p>Enrollment Loss: -3750 x $20000 = -$75,000,000<br />
Athletics Loss: -$10,000,000<br />
= -$85,000,000 </p>
<p>This does not take into account future loss of alumni donations, research grants, rising price of tuition, etc., etc. Throw in your own numbers but that&rsquo;s the equation Baylor is facing and the reason Baylor will not let TAMU go and are more then happy to take 100 years worth of Aggie hate. </p>
<p>Also, those numbers are probably what the SEC is most afraid of in terms of a lawsuit. Baylor may only have 5% chance of winning the lawsuit, but that lawsuit is going to start at roughly 1 billion. =PV(.10,100,100,000,000) x .05<br />
Expected Value = -$50,000,000 </p>
<p>Thus I come back too, if TAMU wants Baylor&rsquo;s sign-off on its move to the SEC then its in A&amp;Ms best interest to help find Baylor find a spot otherwise we are going to all be here for awhile. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hangtime79</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17895</link>
		<dc:creator>hangtime79</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 05:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John this about money and ensuring that the have nots within the Big 12 have a landing spot. I can&#039;t take credit for the idea, Jeff over at FrankTheTank put it forward, but it probably solves everything. Short version: a bucket of money from the haves in the Big 12 and the four have nots go to the Big East. Big East gets the money and a new deal with a bump, cable channel and expanded territory. All Big 12 schools get an AQ conference. TAMU and the SEC then run into each others arms. Otherwise, if SEC brings in TAMU and starts the dominoes there will be suits flying and the SEC may likely win them, but all the dirty laundry for the last five years will get aired out and I don&#039;t think anybody wants that. 
 
From Jeff at FrankTheTank: 
A Brokered Deal 
I think all of this might lead to a brokered deal. The Iowa State&#8217;s and Baylor&#8217;s of the conference have no place to go. But they also realize the Big 12 is going to blow up. If I were them, I would work on a negotiated termination of the Big 12 Conference that lands all the leftovers in the Big East. It probably isn&#8217;t exactly what the Big East wants but they would probably take the bad with the good. In an ideal situation, the Big East ends up with KS, KS St. Mizzou, Iowa State &amp; Baylor. That leaves them with 14 schools. It probably isn&#8217;t everything the BE wants but they might go for it given that their tv contract is up in November of 2012. Texas A&amp;M, Texas, Tex Tech, OK, &amp; OKie State might all have to pitch in and send a big check to the Big East, but that is probably the best outcome for everybody. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John this about money and ensuring that the have nots within the Big 12 have a landing spot. I can&#039;t take credit for the idea, Jeff over at FrankTheTank put it forward, but it probably solves everything. Short version: a bucket of money from the haves in the Big 12 and the four have nots go to the Big East. Big East gets the money and a new deal with a bump, cable channel and expanded territory. All Big 12 schools get an AQ conference. TAMU and the SEC then run into each others arms. Otherwise, if SEC brings in TAMU and starts the dominoes there will be suits flying and the SEC may likely win them, but all the dirty laundry for the last five years will get aired out and I don&#039;t think anybody wants that. </p>
<p>From Jeff at FrankTheTank:<br />
A Brokered Deal<br />
I think all of this might lead to a brokered deal. The Iowa State&rsquo;s and Baylor&rsquo;s of the conference have no place to go. But they also realize the Big 12 is going to blow up. If I were them, I would work on a negotiated termination of the Big 12 Conference that lands all the leftovers in the Big East. It probably isn&rsquo;t exactly what the Big East wants but they would probably take the bad with the good. In an ideal situation, the Big East ends up with KS, KS St. Mizzou, Iowa State &amp; Baylor. That leaves them with 14 schools. It probably isn&rsquo;t everything the BE wants but they might go for it given that their tv contract is up in November of 2012. Texas A&amp;M, Texas, Tex Tech, OK, &amp; OKie State might all have to pitch in and send a big check to the Big East, but that is probably the best outcome for everybody. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Barison</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Barison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 04:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe the nay-sayers in the sports media are likely affiliated with the bottom feeders who have no safety net to fall into to, or their ilk. 
 
Their alma mater&#039;s should be checked into.   
 
As an aside I will second the notion/motion that no  matter how everything shapes up I wish that Baylor isquickly and irreversibly vanquished to the long dark and lonley road athletic perdition. 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the nay-sayers in the sports media are likely affiliated with the bottom feeders who have no safety net to fall into to, or their ilk. </p>
<p>Their alma mater&#039;s should be checked into.   </p>
<p>As an aside I will second the notion/motion that no  matter how everything shapes up I wish that Baylor isquickly and irreversibly vanquished to the long dark and lonley road athletic perdition. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martes Stewart</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17887</link>
		<dc:creator>Martes Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 04:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Idaho probably not feeling so great either.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idaho probably not feeling so great either.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Burgess</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-17883</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 04:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/09/conference-realignment-isnt-evil-its-evolution/#comment-17883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know Sewanee is kicking itself. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know Sewanee is kicking itself. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
