<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expansion By The Numbers 6: Athletic Budgets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrsec.com/2011/10/expansion-by-the-numbers-6-athletic-budgets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/10/expansion-by-the-numbers-6-athletic-budgets/</link>
	<description>Up to the minute SEC football and basketball news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:48:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: CharliChapan</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/10/expansion-by-the-numbers-6-athletic-budgets/comment-page-1/#comment-79688</link>
		<dc:creator>CharliChapan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 14:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=251626#comment-79688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I certainly think this is a great article. I have been reading stuff like this for quite sometime but haven&#039;t found such an engaing piece till now. There is more items that I think you would like on &lt;a href=http://www.finalexpensebootcamp.com&gt;final expense 101&lt;/a&gt;. If You are interested please let me know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly think this is a great article. I have been reading stuff like this for quite sometime but haven&#8217;t found such an engaing piece till now. There is more items that I think you would like on &lt;a href=http://www.finalexpensebootcamp.com&gt;final expense 101&lt;/a&gt;. If You are interested please let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: attention deficit hyperactivity disorders</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/10/expansion-by-the-numbers-6-athletic-budgets/comment-page-1/#comment-36801</link>
		<dc:creator>attention deficit hyperactivity disorders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 21:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=251626#comment-36801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;attention deficit hyperactivity disorders...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Blue Chip Stories &#124; MrSEC.com[...]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>attention deficit hyperactivity disorders&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Blue Chip Stories | MrSEC.com[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Chip Stories &#124; MrSEC.com</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/10/expansion-by-the-numbers-6-athletic-budgets/comment-page-1/#comment-23935</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Chip Stories &#124; MrSEC.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=251626#comment-23935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Part 6: Athletic Budgets looked at &#8212; wait for it &#8212; the athletic spending of each of the 35 schools on our list. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 6: Athletic Budgets looked at &#8212; wait for it &#8212; the athletic spending of each of the 35 schools on our list. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Edwards</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/10/expansion-by-the-numbers-6-athletic-budgets/comment-page-1/#comment-23106</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=251626#comment-23106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ECU is the only one of those schools that doesn&#039;t get BCS money. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ECU is the only one of those schools that doesn&#039;t get BCS money. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/10/expansion-by-the-numbers-6-athletic-budgets/comment-page-1/#comment-22454</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 19:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=251626#comment-22454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The answer is sort of.  Last year UofL earned $25 million in total revenues from men&#039;s basketball.  That was an almost $18 million profit.  For Kansas, those numbers were $15.7 million and $7.5 million respectively.  Those two basketball programs make up for what those colleges lack in football revenues.  Duke earned $12 million in revenues, but their basketball team operated at a $2 million loss.  UCONN earned about $8 million in revenues and $2 million profit.  For Duke and UCONN, this is not so true.  (Figures are from CNN Money from the 2008-2009 season.) 
 
Clearly, Louisville basketball is an outlier for these numbers.  The most likely reason that UofL revenue and profits are so high is that Louisville is the largest metropolitan area in the US without a pro team of any kind.  Thus UofL basketball becomes the de facto king of sports for a decent size city.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is sort of.  Last year UofL earned $25 million in total revenues from men&#039;s basketball.  That was an almost $18 million profit.  For Kansas, those numbers were $15.7 million and $7.5 million respectively.  Those two basketball programs make up for what those colleges lack in football revenues.  Duke earned $12 million in revenues, but their basketball team operated at a $2 million loss.  UCONN earned about $8 million in revenues and $2 million profit.  For Duke and UCONN, this is not so true.  (Figures are from CNN Money from the 2008-2009 season.) </p>
<p>Clearly, Louisville basketball is an outlier for these numbers.  The most likely reason that UofL revenue and profits are so high is that Louisville is the largest metropolitan area in the US without a pro team of any kind.  Thus UofL basketball becomes the de facto king of sports for a decent size city.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kfhonline</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/10/expansion-by-the-numbers-6-athletic-budgets/comment-page-1/#comment-22197</link>
		<dc:creator>kfhonline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 03:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=251626#comment-22197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still say East Carolina.  Like the article states...once a team/university is in the SEC, spending will go up...more dollars will be available. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still say East Carolina.  Like the article states&#8230;once a team/university is in the SEC, spending will go up&#8230;more dollars will be available. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/10/expansion-by-the-numbers-6-athletic-budgets/comment-page-1/#comment-22163</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=251626#comment-22163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virginia was in the top 3 in the Director&#039;s Cup this year.  Won 3 national championships and 7 ACC titles.  Lacrosse, soccer, crew, swimming, tennis, baseball (we were in the final 4) we rock.  Just struggling in football and mid-pack in basketball at the moment but both are on their way back.  Go Hoos.  And Roll Tide.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virginia was in the top 3 in the Director&#039;s Cup this year.  Won 3 national championships and 7 ACC titles.  Lacrosse, soccer, crew, swimming, tennis, baseball (we were in the final 4) we rock.  Just struggling in football and mid-pack in basketball at the moment but both are on their way back.  Go Hoos.  And Roll Tide.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AllTideUp</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/10/expansion-by-the-numbers-6-athletic-budgets/comment-page-1/#comment-22152</link>
		<dc:creator>AllTideUp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 18:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=251626#comment-22152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look at what Virginia spends.... 
 
I thought those people were supposed to be good at math?  lol  They&#039;re like the Chicago Cubs of college atheltics, spending about as much money as all the big boys and pretty much getting nothing in return. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at what Virginia spends&#8230;. </p>
<p>I thought those people were supposed to be good at math?  lol  They&#039;re like the Chicago Cubs of college atheltics, spending about as much money as all the big boys and pretty much getting nothing in return. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarence</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/10/expansion-by-the-numbers-6-athletic-budgets/comment-page-1/#comment-22133</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 14:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=251626#comment-22133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the middle of the 3rd quarter, here&#039;s how they stand with simple rank analysis (lower the better).   
 
RankSchoolSum of Rank  (1-5) 
1Texas A&amp;M 34 
2Texas 38 
3Baylor 46 
4TCU 52 
5Virginia 53 
6Penn State 54 
7N. Carolina 55 
8Duke 55 
9Notre Dame 64 
10Cincinnati 66 
11Virginia Tech 69 
12NC State 71 
13Wake Forest 72 
14Pittsburgh 77 
15Oklahoma 79 
16Rutgers 81 
17Maryland 88 
18E. Carolina 94 
19Texas Tech 94 
20Missouri 96 
21Louisville 98 
22Florida State 98 
23Boston College 101 
24Clemson 102 
25Connecticut 102 
26Navy 103 
27Oklahoma State 106 
28Syracuse 113 
29W. Virginia 113 
30Kansas 116 
31Georgia Tech 118 
32Miami 122 
33S. Florida 132 
34Iowa State 139 
35Kansas State 140 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the middle of the 3rd quarter, here&#039;s how they stand with simple rank analysis (lower the better).   </p>
<p>RankSchoolSum of Rank  (1-5)<br />
1Texas A&amp;M 34<br />
2Texas 38<br />
3Baylor 46<br />
4TCU 52<br />
5Virginia 53<br />
6Penn State 54<br />
7N. Carolina 55<br />
8Duke 55<br />
9Notre Dame 64<br />
10Cincinnati 66<br />
11Virginia Tech 69<br />
12NC State 71<br />
13Wake Forest 72<br />
14Pittsburgh 77<br />
15Oklahoma 79<br />
16Rutgers 81<br />
17Maryland 88<br />
18E. Carolina 94<br />
19Texas Tech 94<br />
20Missouri 96<br />
21Louisville 98<br />
22Florida State 98<br />
23Boston College 101<br />
24Clemson 102<br />
25Connecticut 102<br />
26Navy 103<br />
27Oklahoma State 106<br />
28Syracuse 113<br />
29W. Virginia 113<br />
30Kansas 116<br />
31Georgia Tech 118<br />
32Miami 122<br />
33S. Florida 132<br />
34Iowa State 139<br />
35Kansas State 140 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaxGator</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2011/10/expansion-by-the-numbers-6-athletic-budgets/comment-page-1/#comment-22130</link>
		<dc:creator>JaxGator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 14:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=251626#comment-22130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m surprised by Duke, Louisville, Kansas and UConn. Does (First Class) B-Ball drive that much expense? Most are between 40 to 60 mill, with about a dozen that spend 60+ mill. Only 5 have budgets that meet the SEC average.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m surprised by Duke, Louisville, Kansas and UConn. Does (First Class) B-Ball drive that much expense? Most are between 40 to 60 mill, with about a dozen that spend 60+ mill. Only 5 have budgets that meet the SEC average.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
