<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MrSEC&#8217;s Fife Ratings &#8211; 11/1/11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/</link>
	<description>Up to the minute SEC football and basketball news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 02:16:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jborodawg</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/comment-page-1/#comment-34242</link>
		<dc:creator>Jborodawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 12:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/#comment-34242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d count missed FGs; or at least I&#039;d give them a lot less weight, because it&#039;s an individual stat more than a team stat. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d count missed FGs; or at least I&#039;d give them a lot less weight, because it&#039;s an individual stat more than a team stat. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milo Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/comment-page-1/#comment-32485</link>
		<dc:creator>Milo Moon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/#comment-32485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I fully admit that we are not very good right now. However the foundation is being laid to rebuild the program. I believe that we have the right administration and coaching staff to return UT to the top of the SEC.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully admit that we are not very good right now. However the foundation is being laid to rebuild the program. I believe that we have the right administration and coaching staff to return UT to the top of the SEC.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Things I didn&#8217;t see coming. &#124; Get The Picture</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/comment-page-1/#comment-32455</link>
		<dc:creator>Things I didn&#8217;t see coming. &#124; Get The Picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 11:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/#comment-32455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] John Pennington has a ratings system based on plays per miscue in SEC games.  You can argue about its subjectivity and relevance to wins and losses, I suppose, but two Georgia-related stats jump out at me from this post: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Pennington has a ratings system based on plays per miscue in SEC games.  You can argue about its subjectivity and relevance to wins and losses, I suppose, but two Georgia-related stats jump out at me from this post: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIGHOG</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/comment-page-1/#comment-32343</link>
		<dc:creator>BIGHOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 01:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/#comment-32343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WELL HOUSTON AT LEAST WE CAN COVER UP OUR MISTAKES LOOK AT YOUR RECORD! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WELL HOUSTON AT LEAST WE CAN COVER UP OUR MISTAKES LOOK AT YOUR RECORD! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HoustonVol</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/comment-page-1/#comment-32318</link>
		<dc:creator>HoustonVol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 00:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/#comment-32318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One reason Rob you are so high is the fact that you all run a lot of plays, it helps cover up the mistakes.  
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One reason Rob you are so high is the fact that you all run a lot of plays, it helps cover up the mistakes.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/comment-page-1/#comment-32301</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 23:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/#comment-32301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m an Arkansas fan and I really expected to find us near the bottom of the list. I&#039;m actually very surprised to discover that we&#039;re #2. I guess we&#039;re more solid then I thought. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m an Arkansas fan and I really expected to find us near the bottom of the list. I&#039;m actually very surprised to discover that we&#039;re #2. I guess we&#039;re more solid then I thought. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DV80</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/comment-page-1/#comment-32253</link>
		<dc:creator>DV80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/#comment-32253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Howdy, 
 
Well we do shoot ourselves in the foot a lot.  We&#039;ve had 91 miscues and 653 offensive plays for a rating of 7.18.  Hopefully we&#039;ll be improving soon. 
 
Gig&#039;Em! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howdy, </p>
<p>Well we do shoot ourselves in the foot a lot.  We&#039;ve had 91 miscues and 653 offensive plays for a rating of 7.18.  Hopefully we&#039;ll be improving soon. </p>
<p>Gig&#039;Em! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnmrsec</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/comment-page-1/#comment-32232</link>
		<dc:creator>johnmrsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/#comment-32232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DV80... 
 
We&#039;re simply looking for bad plays.  All five of the areas we considered &quot;miscues&quot; could be given values, but we focused only on how often a team costs itself... not how much it costs itself. 
 
Thanks for reading the site, 
John ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DV80&#8230; </p>
<p>We&#039;re simply looking for bad plays.  All five of the areas we considered &quot;miscues&quot; could be given values, but we focused only on how often a team costs itself&#8230; not how much it costs itself. </p>
<p>Thanks for reading the site,<br />
John </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DV80</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/comment-page-1/#comment-32214</link>
		<dc:creator>DV80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/2011/11/mrsecs-fife-rankings-11111/#comment-32214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John, 
 
The Fife Rating concept is very interesting.  I would think you might want to rate turnovers more heavily than other miscues as they tend to do more damage per occurance than the others, especially when they happen in one&#039;s own end of the field. 
 
I&#039;m looking to see how my Aggies compare.  I might be overly critical, but it just seems like we shoot ourselves in the foot a lot. 
 
Gig&#039;Em! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, </p>
<p>The Fife Rating concept is very interesting.  I would think you might want to rate turnovers more heavily than other miscues as they tend to do more damage per occurance than the others, especially when they happen in one&#039;s own end of the field. </p>
<p>I&#039;m looking to see how my Aggies compare.  I might be overly critical, but it just seems like we shoot ourselves in the foot a lot. </p>
<p>Gig&#039;Em! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
