<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An 18-Game, Divisionless Schedule Would Be Best For SEC Hoops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/</link>
	<description>Up to the minute SEC football and basketball news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:06:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Homepage &#124; MrSEC</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-75923</link>
		<dc:creator>Homepage &#124; MrSEC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 14:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-75923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in basketball, rather than using a simple 4-1-8 plan that we proposed months ago to protect those games that have been played most often, the league is [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in basketball, rather than using a simple 4-1-8 plan that we proposed months ago to protect those games that have been played most often, the league is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homepage &#124; MrSEC</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-75784</link>
		<dc:creator>Homepage &#124; MrSEC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 12:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-75784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] one rotating home and away opponent, and eight games against the league&#8217;s remaining teams.  We called it the 4-1-8 plan back in January.  Such a plan would work and it would answer issues like those brought up yesterday by Georgia coach [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one rotating home and away opponent, and eight games against the league&#8217;s remaining teams.  We called it the 4-1-8 plan back in January.  Such a plan would work and it would answer issues like those brought up yesterday by Georgia coach [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homepage &#124; MrSEC</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-74707</link>
		<dc:creator>Homepage &#124; MrSEC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-74707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] You can read the full plan &#8212; including which of the SEC&#8217;s most-played rivalries would be continued &#8212; right here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can read the full plan &#8212; including which of the SEC&#8217;s most-played rivalries would be continued &#8212; right here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alabama &#124; MrSEC</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-67940</link>
		<dc:creator>Alabama &#124; MrSEC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 00:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-67940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] We broke down how an 18-game divisionless schedule might look &#8212; including our &#8220;4-1-8&#8243; plan &#8212; back in January.  Our plan is based on history and tradition first and foremost. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We broke down how an 18-game divisionless schedule might look &#8212; including our &#8220;4-1-8&#8243; plan &#8212; back in January.  Our plan is based on history and tradition first and foremost. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News &#124; MrSEC</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-60469</link>
		<dc:creator>News &#124; MrSEC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-60469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] once Missouri and Texas A&amp;M are welcomed into the fold this summer.&#160; In our view:* A divisionless, tradition-based approach should be taken in basketball&#8230; * A divisionless, tradition-based approach should be taken in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] once Missouri and Texas A&amp;M are welcomed into the fold this summer.&nbsp; In our view:* A divisionless, tradition-based approach should be taken in basketball&#8230; * A divisionless, tradition-based approach should be taken in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m_Ag</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-59359</link>
		<dc:creator>m_Ag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-59359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was fooling around with this idea a few months back while half watching a football game.  It is complicated to set up because every pair of secondary rival has to fit in a complimentary &#039;slot&#039; on each others schedule.

 

However, I did come up with an alignment that works.  It&#039;s based on geography, as I didn&#039;t have a list of most played rivalries in the SEC.  I won&#039;t argue it&#039;s perfect, but it shows that it is possible.  I&#039;d like the SEC honchos who get paid to make schedules to design their own version.

 

Anyway, here&#039;s the setup I constructed:

 

Example with explanation:

FL-UG,AU,SC  (LSU,A&amp;M,UK,Bama)

H=OM,UT,MU

A=MSU,VU,Arkie

 

for Florida, Georgia, Auburn, and SC are permanent rivals, the 4 schools in parentheses are secondary rivals.  OM, UT, MU are teams you play at home in years 1 &amp; 3 (away in 2 &amp; 4).  MSU,VU, Arkie are teams you play away in years 1 &amp; 3 (home in 2 &amp; 4).

 

The order the secondary rivals are listed indicates where you play them over 4 years (that&#039;s the complicated part in setting this up), but that&#039;s only important if you want to make your own version.

 

The rest of this example:

UG-SC,FL,AU  (UT,MSU,VU,UK)

H=A&amp;M,Arkie,Bama

A=LSU,MU,OM

AU-FL,UG,Bama (UK,SC,LSU,MSU)

H=A&amp;M,OM,VU

A=Arkie,UT,MU

SC-UG,UF,UT  (VU,UK,MU,AU)

H=LSU,Arkie,MSU

A=A&amp;M,Bama,OM

UT-VU,UK,SC  (Bama,Arkie,UG,MU)

H=A&amp;M,OM,AU

A=FL,MSU,LSU

BAMA-AU,OM,MSU (A&amp;M,FL,UT,LSU)

H=SC,Arkie,VU

A=UG,UK,MU

UK-UT,MU,VU  (FL,UG,AU,SC)

H=Bama,MSU,LSU

A=A&amp;M,OM,Arkie

VU-UT,UK,OM (UG,MU,SC,Arkie)

H=FL,LSU,MSU

A=A&amp;M,Bama,AU

OM-Bama,MSU,VU (MU,LSU,Arkie,A&amp;M)

H=UG,SC,UK

A=FL,UT,AU

MSU-Bama,OM,LSU (Arkie,AU,A&amp;M,UG)

H=FL,UT,MU

A=SC,UK,VU

LSU-A&amp;M,Arkie,MSU (AU,Bama,FL,OM)

H=UG,UT,MU

A=SC,UK,VU

Arkie-A&amp;M,MU,LSU (OM,VU,MSU,UT)

H=FL,UK,AU

A=UG,SC,Bama

A&amp;M-LSU,Arkie,MU (MSU,OM,Bama,FL)

H=SC,UK,VU

A=UG,UT,AU

MU-UK,A&amp;M,Arkie (SC,UT,OM,VU)

H=UG,Bama,AU

A=FL,LSU,MSU

 

I like this idea as it gives everyone a mostly sensible set of rivals.  I think it&#039;s nice for variety that Arkansas plays Georgia every year.  But I don&#039;t see any reason for them ever to play twice in the regular season when they could be each be playing border states with regularity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was fooling around with this idea a few months back while half watching a football game.  It is complicated to set up because every pair of secondary rival has to fit in a complimentary &#8216;slot&#8217; on each others schedule.</p>
<p>However, I did come up with an alignment that works.  It&#8217;s based on geography, as I didn&#8217;t have a list of most played rivalries in the SEC.  I won&#8217;t argue it&#8217;s perfect, but it shows that it is possible.  I&#8217;d like the SEC honchos who get paid to make schedules to design their own version.</p>
<p>Anyway, here&#8217;s the setup I constructed:</p>
<p>Example with explanation:</p>
<p>FL-UG,AU,SC  (LSU,A&amp;M,UK,Bama)</p>
<p>H=OM,UT,MU</p>
<p>A=MSU,VU,Arkie</p>
<p>for Florida, Georgia, Auburn, and SC are permanent rivals, the 4 schools in parentheses are secondary rivals.  OM, UT, MU are teams you play at home in years 1 &amp; 3 (away in 2 &amp; 4).  MSU,VU, Arkie are teams you play away in years 1 &amp; 3 (home in 2 &amp; 4).</p>
<p>The order the secondary rivals are listed indicates where you play them over 4 years (that&#8217;s the complicated part in setting this up), but that&#8217;s only important if you want to make your own version.</p>
<p>The rest of this example:</p>
<p>UG-SC,FL,AU  (UT,MSU,VU,UK)</p>
<p>H=A&amp;M,Arkie,Bama</p>
<p>A=LSU,MU,OM</p>
<p>AU-FL,UG,Bama (UK,SC,LSU,MSU)</p>
<p>H=A&amp;M,OM,VU</p>
<p>A=Arkie,UT,MU</p>
<p>SC-UG,UF,UT  (VU,UK,MU,AU)</p>
<p>H=LSU,Arkie,MSU</p>
<p>A=A&amp;M,Bama,OM</p>
<p>UT-VU,UK,SC  (Bama,Arkie,UG,MU)</p>
<p>H=A&amp;M,OM,AU</p>
<p>A=FL,MSU,LSU</p>
<p>BAMA-AU,OM,MSU (A&amp;M,FL,UT,LSU)</p>
<p>H=SC,Arkie,VU</p>
<p>A=UG,UK,MU</p>
<p>UK-UT,MU,VU  (FL,UG,AU,SC)</p>
<p>H=Bama,MSU,LSU</p>
<p>A=A&amp;M,OM,Arkie</p>
<p>VU-UT,UK,OM (UG,MU,SC,Arkie)</p>
<p>H=FL,LSU,MSU</p>
<p>A=A&amp;M,Bama,AU</p>
<p>OM-Bama,MSU,VU (MU,LSU,Arkie,A&amp;M)</p>
<p>H=UG,SC,UK</p>
<p>A=FL,UT,AU</p>
<p>MSU-Bama,OM,LSU (Arkie,AU,A&amp;M,UG)</p>
<p>H=FL,UT,MU</p>
<p>A=SC,UK,VU</p>
<p>LSU-A&amp;M,Arkie,MSU (AU,Bama,FL,OM)</p>
<p>H=UG,UT,MU</p>
<p>A=SC,UK,VU</p>
<p>Arkie-A&amp;M,MU,LSU (OM,VU,MSU,UT)</p>
<p>H=FL,UK,AU</p>
<p>A=UG,SC,Bama</p>
<p>A&amp;M-LSU,Arkie,MU (MSU,OM,Bama,FL)</p>
<p>H=SC,UK,VU</p>
<p>A=UG,UT,AU</p>
<p>MU-UK,A&amp;M,Arkie (SC,UT,OM,VU)</p>
<p>H=UG,Bama,AU</p>
<p>A=FL,LSU,MSU</p>
<p>I like this idea as it gives everyone a mostly sensible set of rivals.  I think it&#8217;s nice for variety that Arkansas plays Georgia every year.  But I don&#8217;t see any reason for them ever to play twice in the regular season when they could be each be playing border states with regularity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m_Ag</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-59306</link>
		<dc:creator>m_Ag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-59306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a bit complicated for the people who get paid to make schedules.  It&#039;s not complicated to the fans who get the schedules each year.

As a possible example, for Florida, give Georgia, South Carolina, and Auburn as primary rivals, and LSU, A&amp;M, UK, and Alabama as secondary rivals.  Their 4 year schedule can look like:

Year 1 H:UG,AU,SC,A&amp;M,Bama,LSU,OM,UT,MU
           A:UG,AU,SC,A&amp;M,Bama,UK,MSU,VU,Arkie
Year 2 H:UG,AU,SC,LSU,UK,A&amp;M,MSU,VU,Arkie
           A:UG,AU,SC,LSU,UK,Bama,OM,UT,MU
Year 3 H:UG,AU,SC,A&amp;M,Bama,UK,OM,UT,MU
           A:UG,AU,SC,A&amp;M,Bama,LSU,MSU,VU,Arkie
Year 4:H:UG,AU,SC,LSU,UK,Bama,MSU,VU,Arkie
           A:UG,AU,SC,LSU,UK,A&amp;M,OM,UT,MU

They get the variety of playing every SEC team every year, but also get to establish regular rivals with their own personalized &#039;division&#039; of 7 teams.

Also, travel would be reduced for the interior schools by keeping most of their rivals geographically close (not as much for a school like Florida).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a bit complicated for the people who get paid to make schedules.  It&#8217;s not complicated to the fans who get the schedules each year.</p>
<p>As a possible example, for Florida, give Georgia, South Carolina, and Auburn as primary rivals, and LSU, A&amp;M, UK, and Alabama as secondary rivals.  Their 4 year schedule can look like:</p>
<p>Year 1 H:UG,AU,SC,A&amp;M,Bama,LSU,OM,UT,MU<br />
           A:UG,AU,SC,A&amp;M,Bama,UK,MSU,VU,Arkie<br />
Year 2 H:UG,AU,SC,LSU,UK,A&amp;M,MSU,VU,Arkie<br />
           A:UG,AU,SC,LSU,UK,Bama,OM,UT,MU<br />
Year 3 H:UG,AU,SC,A&amp;M,Bama,UK,OM,UT,MU<br />
           A:UG,AU,SC,A&amp;M,Bama,LSU,MSU,VU,Arkie<br />
Year 4:H:UG,AU,SC,LSU,UK,Bama,MSU,VU,Arkie<br />
           A:UG,AU,SC,LSU,UK,A&amp;M,OM,UT,MU</p>
<p>They get the variety of playing every SEC team every year, but also get to establish regular rivals with their own personalized &#8216;division&#8217; of 7 teams.</p>
<p>Also, travel would be reduced for the interior schools by keeping most of their rivals geographically close (not as much for a school like Florida).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m_Ag</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-59303</link>
		<dc:creator>m_Ag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-59303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Nelson @m_Ag ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nelson @m_Ag </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-59200</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-59200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@SEC Writer@dynamite And if North Carolina and NC State can stop playing twice a year, Tennessee and Kentucky can too. This would be a good format for the SEC, and I would have the exact same pairings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SEC Writer@dynamite And if North Carolina and NC State can stop playing twice a year, Tennessee and Kentucky can too. This would be a good format for the SEC, and I would have the exact same pairings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-59198</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-59198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@m_Ag Way too complicated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@m_Ag Way too complicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-59197</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-59197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@SEC Writer@dynamite This is EXACTLY the format the ACC is going to use when Pitt and Syracuse join.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SEC Writer@dynamite This is EXACTLY the format the ACC is going to use when Pitt and Syracuse join.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEC Writer</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-57645</link>
		<dc:creator>SEC Writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-57645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Dynamite fan 

I would prefer that each team plays an 18 game schedule with ONE permanent foe home and away every season and then rotate the other FOUR home and away opponents between the other Twelve schools so, you would face every team in the league home and away in a season every three years.

Here are my choices for the permanent home and away foes
Alabama-Auburn
Arkansas-Missouri
Georgia-South Carolina
LSU-Texas A&amp;M
Miss.State-Ole Miss
Tennessee-Vanderbilt
Kentucky-Florida]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dynamite fan </p>
<p>I would prefer that each team plays an 18 game schedule with ONE permanent foe home and away every season and then rotate the other FOUR home and away opponents between the other Twelve schools so, you would face every team in the league home and away in a season every three years.</p>
<p>Here are my choices for the permanent home and away foes<br />
Alabama-Auburn<br />
Arkansas-Missouri<br />
Georgia-South Carolina<br />
LSU-Texas A&amp;M<br />
Miss.State-Ole Miss<br />
Tennessee-Vanderbilt<br />
Kentucky-Florida</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alabama &#124; MrSEC</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-57236</link>
		<dc:creator>Alabama &#124; MrSEC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-57236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] etc, etc.&#8221;  Such mumbo wouldn&#8217;t be needed.  Our plan would be as easy as 1-2-3.  You can find that 4-1-8 basketball plan here.Well, just as we set out to protect the oldest basketball rivalries with that format, we&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] etc, etc.&#8221;  Such mumbo wouldn&#8217;t be needed.  Our plan would be as easy as 1-2-3.  You can find that 4-1-8 basketball plan here.Well, just as we set out to protect the oldest basketball rivalries with that format, we&#8217;ve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC SportsNation &#187; Mizzou News, Notes and Links 1/30/12: HUGE WEEK for Mizzou: MU-Texas Part 2, 48 hours till DGB decision, Border War/Hate Week, more &#187; KC SportsNation</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-57169</link>
		<dc:creator>KC SportsNation &#187; Mizzou News, Notes and Links 1/30/12: HUGE WEEK for Mizzou: MU-Texas Part 2, 48 hours till DGB decision, Border War/Hate Week, more &#187; KC SportsNation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-57169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Mr. SEC: An 18-Game, Divisionless Schedule Would Be Best For SEC Hoops [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mr. SEC: An 18-Game, Divisionless Schedule Would Be Best For SEC Hoops [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeauxState</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-56722</link>
		<dc:creator>GeauxState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-56722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[is it baseball season yet...... tired of basketball]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is it baseball season yet&#8230;&#8230; tired of basketball</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubba Gump</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-56702</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba Gump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-56702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John,

 

Sorry about the numerous typos and errors in that last one - meant to put Shaq in one of the Dale Brown spots

 

hopefully more awake now, and looking at how the current SEC women schedule works as a possible model :

 

16 games falls out like this (using Tennessee women this season as reference)

 

East = 8 games

Home and Home

Vanderbilt = 2 games

Kentucky = 2 games

Georgia = 2 games

Home or Away

South Carolina = 1 game

Florida = 1 game

 

West = 8 games

Home and Home

Arkansas = 2 games

Auburn = 2 games

Home or Away

Alabama = 1 game

LSU = 1 game

Mississippi = 1 game

Mississippi State = 1 game

 

Now this has fixed and rotating schools in each division, and it gets a bit confusing at times, but going to 18 or 19 is not that difficult because the women have been doing it for years. Point being there is precedent, and it allows for balance schedules over times while not so tightly locked by division.

 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Sorry about the numerous typos and errors in that last one &#8211; meant to put Shaq in one of the Dale Brown spots</p>
<p>hopefully more awake now, and looking at how the current SEC women schedule works as a possible model :</p>
<p>16 games falls out like this (using Tennessee women this season as reference)</p>
<p>East = 8 games</p>
<p>Home and Home</p>
<p>Vanderbilt = 2 games</p>
<p>Kentucky = 2 games</p>
<p>Georgia = 2 games</p>
<p>Home or Away</p>
<p>South Carolina = 1 game</p>
<p>Florida = 1 game</p>
<p>West = 8 games</p>
<p>Home and Home</p>
<p>Arkansas = 2 games</p>
<p>Auburn = 2 games</p>
<p>Home or Away</p>
<p>Alabama = 1 game</p>
<p>LSU = 1 game</p>
<p>Mississippi = 1 game</p>
<p>Mississippi State = 1 game</p>
<p>Now this has fixed and rotating schools in each division, and it gets a bit confusing at times, but going to 18 or 19 is not that difficult because the women have been doing it for years. Point being there is precedent, and it allows for balance schedules over times while not so tightly locked by division.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TigerinMO</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-56674</link>
		<dc:creator>TigerinMO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-56674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Dynamite fan As much as I&#039;d like to see one in KC or STL, I could handle it being in Nashville every year. Great city!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dynamite fan As much as I&#8217;d like to see one in KC or STL, I could handle it being in Nashville every year. Great city!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deltaboy</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-56667</link>
		<dc:creator>deltaboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-56667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All this is giving me a headache.  Why not just go back to divisions like in football?  The Big 10 &amp; PAC 12 have it right.  Arrange the schedule so as to enhance competition &amp; rivalries within the conference &amp; quit worrying so much about the post-season.  That&#039;s like teaching for test scores instead of for learning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this is giving me a headache.  Why not just go back to divisions like in football?  The Big 10 &amp; PAC 12 have it right.  Arrange the schedule so as to enhance competition &amp; rivalries within the conference &amp; quit worrying so much about the post-season.  That&#8217;s like teaching for test scores instead of for learning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dynamite fan</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-56647</link>
		<dc:creator>Dynamite fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-56647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@TigerinMO

 TN: KY, VA, NC, GA, AL, MS, AR, MO

 

MO: OK, AR, TN, KY, IL, IA, NE, KS

Tennesse borders every SEC state but FL, LA, TX, SC so almost all of UT&#039;s and Vandy&#039;s SEC games are border games. It&#039;s also why the SEC tourney should be in Nashville every year, it is centrally located.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@TigerinMO</p>
<p> TN: KY, VA, NC, GA, AL, MS, AR, MO</p>
<p>MO: OK, AR, TN, KY, IL, IA, NE, KS</p>
<p>Tennesse borders every SEC state but FL, LA, TX, SC so almost all of UT&#8217;s and Vandy&#8217;s SEC games are border games. It&#8217;s also why the SEC tourney should be in Nashville every year, it is centrally located.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gsb1952</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-56624</link>
		<dc:creator>gsb1952</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-56624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting plan.   I like having no divisions.   It is important to have an even number of games at home and away.  I  also like the idea of playing 18 games.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting plan.   I like having no divisions.   It is important to have an even number of games at home and away.  I  also like the idea of playing 18 games.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TigerinMO</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-56622</link>
		<dc:creator>TigerinMO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-56622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s tough to make this all work out. Missouri and Tennessee share a common border. It would be nice to play UT and Vandy regularly. TRIVIA QUESTION: Missouri and Tennessee are the only states that border eight other states. Can you name them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s tough to make this all work out. Missouri and Tennessee share a common border. It would be nice to play UT and Vandy regularly. TRIVIA QUESTION: Missouri and Tennessee are the only states that border eight other states. Can you name them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddha22</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-56621</link>
		<dc:creator>buddha22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-56621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d prefer seated schedules based on previous years results that would then incorporate some of these home and away ideas and give everyone an opportunity at a conference title, not just those that duck a UK or MU as a permanent foe/rival. It is not like football where there will be a lot of fan travel before the tournament. Also, it will permit the new schools the opportunity to see more of the conference rather than be &quot;slotted.&quot; The beauty of the BB season is there is plenty of inventory and if the 19 game schedule seems too difficult, then simply apply 1-14 on previous years conference results and place into pre-made schedule through an 18 week schedule.

 

The real question is do you weight the schedule so from  the top 8-12  teams from the previous year play more games against each other than  the &quot;2nd&quot; division.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d prefer seated schedules based on previous years results that would then incorporate some of these home and away ideas and give everyone an opportunity at a conference title, not just those that duck a UK or MU as a permanent foe/rival. It is not like football where there will be a lot of fan travel before the tournament. Also, it will permit the new schools the opportunity to see more of the conference rather than be &#8220;slotted.&#8221; The beauty of the BB season is there is plenty of inventory and if the 19 game schedule seems too difficult, then simply apply 1-14 on previous years conference results and place into pre-made schedule through an 18 week schedule.</p>
<p>The real question is do you weight the schedule so from  the top 8-12  teams from the previous year play more games against each other than  the &#8220;2nd&#8221; division.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m_Ag</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-56608</link>
		<dc:creator>m_Ag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-56608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not a bad plan, although I don&#039;t see much point in having 1 rotational foe.  You&#039;ll play the other 9 foes an extra 1 time every 9 years. 


I prefer a slightly more complicated arrangement where every team is given 3 primary rivals and 4 secondary rivals.


Every year, play all 3 primary rivals + 2 secondary rivals both home and away;  play the other 2 secondary rivals + the other 6 SEC schools once each.


The 2 secondary rivals you play both home and away swap each year.


With this arrangement, in a 4 year &#039;normal&#039; college career, a team would play:

  each of their 3 primary rivals 4 times at home, 4 times away;

  each of their 4 secondary rivals 3 times at home, 3 times away;

 each of the other 6 SEC teams 2 times at home, 2 times away.


This gives each school a larger set of rivalries while still allowing every team in the conference to play each other every year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a bad plan, although I don&#8217;t see much point in having 1 rotational foe.  You&#8217;ll play the other 9 foes an extra 1 time every 9 years. </p>
<p>I prefer a slightly more complicated arrangement where every team is given 3 primary rivals and 4 secondary rivals.</p>
<p>Every year, play all 3 primary rivals + 2 secondary rivals both home and away;  play the other 2 secondary rivals + the other 6 SEC schools once each.</p>
<p>The 2 secondary rivals you play both home and away swap each year.</p>
<p>With this arrangement, in a 4 year &#8216;normal&#8217; college career, a team would play:</p>
<p>  each of their 3 primary rivals 4 times at home, 4 times away;</p>
<p>  each of their 4 secondary rivals 3 times at home, 3 times away;</p>
<p> each of the other 6 SEC teams 2 times at home, 2 times away.</p>
<p>This gives each school a larger set of rivalries while still allowing every team in the conference to play each other every year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dynamite fan</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/01/an-18-game-divisionless-schedule-would-be-best-for-sec-hoops/comment-page-1/#comment-56600</link>
		<dc:creator>Dynamite fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=253775#comment-56600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good plan but I&#039;d rather have 2  permanent games and 3 rotating home and homes. Anything beats a 19 game schedule that makes the SEC road even tougher.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good plan but I&#8217;d rather have 2  permanent games and 3 rotating home and homes. Anything beats a 19 game schedule that makes the SEC road even tougher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
