<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEC Headlines 6/2/2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrsec.com/2012/06/sec-headlines-622012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/06/sec-headlines-622012/</link>
	<description>Up to the minute SEC football and basketball news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 05:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: 10Vol85</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/06/sec-headlines-622012/comment-page-1/#comment-76432</link>
		<dc:creator>10Vol85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 03:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=255626#comment-76432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll save you the trouble.  Here are the seasons in which the AP had the best 4 teams pre-bowl as judged by the AP post-bowl:
1978, 1982, 1987, 1996, 1999, 2005
That&#039;s out of a possible 45 seasons (1965, 1968-2011)
FWIW, in 1999 the top 4 were in the correct order as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll save you the trouble.  Here are the seasons in which the AP had the best 4 teams pre-bowl as judged by the AP post-bowl:<br />
1978, 1982, 1987, 1996, 1999, 2005<br />
That&#8217;s out of a possible 45 seasons (1965, 1968-2011)<br />
FWIW, in 1999 the top 4 were in the correct order as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10Vol85</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/06/sec-headlines-622012/comment-page-1/#comment-76424</link>
		<dc:creator>10Vol85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 02:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=255626#comment-76424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;best 4 teams&quot; -  So, why don&#039;t you run the numbers from the mid-60s, when the AP started voting again after the bowls up through 1997 before the BCS was implemented (locking down the top two).  Use the AP as a surrogate for the BCS to see just how many times the best 4 teams (as indicated by the final poll - the more accurate of the two polls) would have been selected (as indicated by the pre-bowl poll - which would have been used to select the teams for a playoff).  I bet the results would show that the &quot;best 4 teams&quot; would have been selected very few times.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;best 4 teams&#8221; -  So, why don&#8217;t you run the numbers from the mid-60s, when the AP started voting again after the bowls up through 1997 before the BCS was implemented (locking down the top two).  Use the AP as a surrogate for the BCS to see just how many times the best 4 teams (as indicated by the final poll &#8211; the more accurate of the two polls) would have been selected (as indicated by the pre-bowl poll &#8211; which would have been used to select the teams for a playoff).  I bet the results would show that the &#8220;best 4 teams&#8221; would have been selected very few times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
