<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MrSEC.com Power Rankings &#8211; 10/30/12</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mrsec.com/2012/10/mrsec-com-power-rankings-103012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2012/10/mrsec-com-power-rankings-103012/</link>
	<description>Up to the minute SEC football and basketball news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 07:08:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: John at MrSEC</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2012/10/mrsec-com-power-rankings-103012/comment-page-1/#comment-102150</link>
		<dc:creator>John at MrSEC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=259285#comment-102150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@DaveHenson 
 
The video recap is the opinion of John Miller, not the main writer for this site -- me, John Pennington.  So I really don&#039;t know what you&#039;re comment is about.
 
Thanks for visiting the site,John]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DaveHenson <br />
 <br />
The video recap is the opinion of John Miller, not the main writer for this site &#8212; me, John Pennington.  So I really don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re comment is about.<br />
 <br />
Thanks for visiting the site,John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveHenson</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2012/10/mrsec-com-power-rankings-103012/comment-page-1/#comment-102144</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveHenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=259285#comment-102144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uh, so, you do realize that LSU and Georgia are now ranked higher than  Florida in the BCS, right?  In this week&#039;s video recap, you still think  only Alabama and Florida have a chance to meet for an all-SEC national  championship game and then layout a three-fer scenario for Florida (LSU  beating Bama, Ole Miss or Auburn beating Georgia, then Florida beating  LSU for SEC championship) to get them to the national championship game  versus Alabama.  That is quite the stretch for the ol&#039; Gators, sir.  A more  feasible scenario might have Georgia winning out, including an upset in  the SEC championship, only to be rematched with one-loss Alabama for the  national championship.  Or, LSU winning out and playing one-loss  Alabama for the national championship (sound familiar?).  Both are more likely than your  Florida triple ding dong scenario.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, so, you do realize that LSU and Georgia are now ranked higher than  Florida in the BCS, right?  In this week&#8217;s video recap, you still think  only Alabama and Florida have a chance to meet for an all-SEC national  championship game and then layout a three-fer scenario for Florida (LSU  beating Bama, Ole Miss or Auburn beating Georgia, then Florida beating  LSU for SEC championship) to get them to the national championship game  versus Alabama.  That is quite the stretch for the ol&#8217; Gators, sir.  A more  feasible scenario might have Georgia winning out, including an upset in  the SEC championship, only to be rematched with one-loss Alabama for the  national championship.  Or, LSU winning out and playing one-loss  Alabama for the national championship (sound familiar?).  Both are more likely than your  Florida triple ding dong scenario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John at MrSEC</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2012/10/mrsec-com-power-rankings-103012/comment-page-1/#comment-102117</link>
		<dc:creator>John at MrSEC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=259285#comment-102117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@10Vol85 
 
I thought I&#039;d made it clear in the Vanderbilt portion of the story why the teams listed as &quot;basement contenders&quot; were placed in that category -- they&#039;ve all won two fewer SEC games than Vandy and currently sit winless at the bottom of their respective divisions.  
 
Hard to say that Auburn, Kentucky and Tennessee aren&#039;t &quot;basement contenders&quot; when they&#039;re winless and sitting in the league cellar.
 
Thanks for reading the site,
John]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@10Vol85 <br />
 <br />
I thought I&#8217;d made it clear in the Vanderbilt portion of the story why the teams listed as &#8220;basement contenders&#8221; were placed in that category &#8212; they&#8217;ve all won two fewer SEC games than Vandy and currently sit winless at the bottom of their respective divisions.  <br />
 <br />
Hard to say that Auburn, Kentucky and Tennessee aren&#8217;t &#8220;basement contenders&#8221; when they&#8217;re winless and sitting in the league cellar.<br />
 <br />
Thanks for reading the site,<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoKelly1</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2012/10/mrsec-com-power-rankings-103012/comment-page-1/#comment-102106</link>
		<dc:creator>MoKelly1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=259285#comment-102106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mizzou&#039;s loss to Vandy was very bad as far as bowl chances. We just plain needed to win that game. So, I guess our best chance for an SEC road game win is at Tenn. James Franklin better be healthy (really healthy) and able to pose a real run threat or its not gonna be good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mizzou&#8217;s loss to Vandy was very bad as far as bowl chances. We just plain needed to win that game. So, I guess our best chance for an SEC road game win is at Tenn. James Franklin better be healthy (really healthy) and able to pose a real run threat or its not gonna be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10Vol85</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2012/10/mrsec-com-power-rankings-103012/comment-page-1/#comment-101984</link>
		<dc:creator>10Vol85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 02:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=259285#comment-101984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arkansas (3-5) with Tulsa, at S. Carolina, at Miss. State, LSU is a bowl contender yet Tennessee (3-5) with Troy, Missouri, at Vanderbilt, Kentucky is not?  Extremely poor logic.  They&#039;re both bowl contending.  Unless there&#039;s something I&#039;m missing, I assume they each would need to get to 6-6 to make a bowl.  With those schedules, it&#039;s more likely for TN to go 3-1 or better in their remaining games than Arkansas.  If you want to argue that TN could lose out in the SEC and finish in the &quot;basement&quot;, sure they can.  But your standard is stated as &quot;what we believe each squad’s ceiling to be&quot;.  I assume that means you believe it&#039;s highly unlikely they&#039;ll do better than 2-2.  While I could see it happening, I certainly wouldn&#039;t consider it highly unlikely and particulary when compared to Arkansas&#039; chances.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arkansas (3-5) with Tulsa, at S. Carolina, at Miss. State, LSU is a bowl contender yet Tennessee (3-5) with Troy, Missouri, at Vanderbilt, Kentucky is not?  Extremely poor logic.  They&#8217;re both bowl contending.  Unless there&#8217;s something I&#8217;m missing, I assume they each would need to get to 6-6 to make a bowl.  With those schedules, it&#8217;s more likely for TN to go 3-1 or better in their remaining games than Arkansas.  If you want to argue that TN could lose out in the SEC and finish in the &#8220;basement&#8221;, sure they can.  But your standard is stated as &#8220;what we believe each squad’s ceiling to be&#8221;.  I assume that means you believe it&#8217;s highly unlikely they&#8217;ll do better than 2-2.  While I could see it happening, I certainly wouldn&#8217;t consider it highly unlikely and particulary when compared to Arkansas&#8217; chances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recruiting Forum: Football Talk II - Page 132 - VolNation</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/2012/10/mrsec-com-power-rankings-103012/comment-page-1/#comment-101972</link>
		<dc:creator>Recruiting Forum: Football Talk II - Page 132 - VolNation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=259285#comment-101972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the meme that Tennessee is a bunch of quitters that will fold down the stretch, like last year.    MrSEC.com Power Rankings &#8211; 10/30/12 Thats absolute B.S.  The only way the VOLS wouldn&#039;t be bowl eligible is if they lost to Vandy and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the meme that Tennessee is a bunch of quitters that will fold down the stretch, like last year.    MrSEC.com Power Rankings &#8211; 10/30/12 Thats absolute B.S.  The only way the VOLS wouldn&#039;t be bowl eligible is if they lost to Vandy and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
