<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MrSEC Commitment Comparator &#8211; 11/14/12</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrsec.com/2012/11/mrsec-commitment-comparator-111412/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/11/mrsec-commitment-comparator-111412/</link>
	<description>Up to the minute SEC football and basketball news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:50:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: j_scott_o</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/11/mrsec-commitment-comparator-111412/comment-page-1/#comment-105480</link>
		<dc:creator>j_scott_o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=259709#comment-105480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@John at MrSEC
 Oh, I totally agree.  That was kinda poor wording on my part in the last sentence.  I should not have put the word &quot;just&quot; in there.  Regardless, thanks for providing the breakdown.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John at MrSEC<br />
 Oh, I totally agree.  That was kinda poor wording on my part in the last sentence.  I should not have put the word &#8220;just&#8221; in there.  Regardless, thanks for providing the breakdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BonzaiB</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/11/mrsec-commitment-comparator-111412/comment-page-1/#comment-105479</link>
		<dc:creator>BonzaiB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=259709#comment-105479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@buddha22 I like that. A true mission for an obsessed spreadsheet manipulating football fanatic. I think what you will find is the programs that are attracting the best recruits are also the programs coaching them up the best, but it would be fun to look at.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@buddha22 I like that. A true mission for an obsessed spreadsheet manipulating football fanatic. I think what you will find is the programs that are attracting the best recruits are also the programs coaching them up the best, but it would be fun to look at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RAB83</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/11/mrsec-commitment-comparator-111412/comment-page-1/#comment-105472</link>
		<dc:creator>RAB83</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=259709#comment-105472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@j_scott_o  - rivals seems to have a bias for more stars for commits to established programs. In a way this makes sense. If Saban wants a guy, he sees something and we know he&#039;s a good judge of talent. Take their ratings with a grain of salt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@j_scott_o  &#8211; rivals seems to have a bias for more stars for commits to established programs. In a way this makes sense. If Saban wants a guy, he sees something and we know he&#8217;s a good judge of talent. Take their ratings with a grain of salt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddha22</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/11/mrsec-commitment-comparator-111412/comment-page-1/#comment-105425</link>
		<dc:creator>buddha22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 01:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=259709#comment-105425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be interesting to see NFL signees vs star ratings, then broken down by program. It may show which programs actually &quot;coach them up&quot; vs running them through.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to see NFL signees vs star ratings, then broken down by program. It may show which programs actually &#8220;coach them up&#8221; vs running them through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John at MrSEC</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/11/mrsec-commitment-comparator-111412/comment-page-1/#comment-105400</link>
		<dc:creator>John at MrSEC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=259709#comment-105400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@j_scott_o 
 
That&#039;s why we show you three different charts... quantity, quality and high-end talent.  You can make up your own mind as to who&#039;s having the best class.
 
Thanks for reading the site,
John]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@j_scott_o <br />
 <br />
That&#8217;s why we show you three different charts&#8230; quantity, quality and high-end talent.  You can make up your own mind as to who&#8217;s having the best class.<br />
 <br />
Thanks for reading the site,<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j_scott_o</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/11/mrsec-commitment-comparator-111412/comment-page-1/#comment-105387</link>
		<dc:creator>j_scott_o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=259709#comment-105387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BTW, great article...something interesting to look over.  Another something interesting that you might have done is maybe take the top 10 rated players for each team and give an average star rating.  Then maybe top 12 players.   Think that would provide even more context into the quality of players.  As it stands, you could have a team with 10 players and the average is 4 stars.  But, you could have another school with 15 players, of which 10 are 4 stars and 5 are 3 stars, but, if you just looked at the average star rankings for that class, you would think the 1st school had a better class.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, great article&#8230;something interesting to look over.  Another something interesting that you might have done is maybe take the top 10 rated players for each team and give an average star rating.  Then maybe top 12 players.   Think that would provide even more context into the quality of players.  As it stands, you could have a team with 10 players and the average is 4 stars.  But, you could have another school with 15 players, of which 10 are 4 stars and 5 are 3 stars, but, if you just looked at the average star rankings for that class, you would think the 1st school had a better class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j_scott_o</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2012/11/mrsec-commitment-comparator-111412/comment-page-1/#comment-105383</link>
		<dc:creator>j_scott_o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=259709#comment-105383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And, here is a little something to think about when it comes to stars and ratings:   Johnny Manziel was a 3-star in 2011.   Would hate to see him if he were a 5-star!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, here is a little something to think about when it comes to stars and ratings:   Johnny Manziel was a 3-star in 2011.   Would hate to see him if he were a 5-star!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
