<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MrSEC.com Commitment Comparator &#8211; 1/17/13</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrsec.com/2013/01/mrsec-com-commitment-comparator-11713/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrsec.com/2013/01/mrsec-com-commitment-comparator-11713/</link>
	<description>Up to the minute SEC football and basketball news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 22:08:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: twoods5244</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2013/01/mrsec-com-commitment-comparator-11713/comment-page-1/#comment-119649</link>
		<dc:creator>twoods5244</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=266345#comment-119649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did Ole Miss not pick up a 5 star recruit, Laquon Treadwell, yesterday 1/17/2012 and another 3 star?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Ole Miss not pick up a 5 star recruit, Laquon Treadwell, yesterday 1/17/2012 and another 3 star?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoglin</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2013/01/mrsec-com-commitment-comparator-11713/comment-page-1/#comment-119645</link>
		<dc:creator>hoglin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=266345#comment-119645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hard not to be nervous with things in the Ozarks.  I am BB fan and his staff seems to be outstanding.  Do they have something up their sleeve?  Why have they let several recruits out of their commitment but don&#039;t seem to be getting a ton of new commits?  Not panicking, just nervous.  Would love to hear your take on the situation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard not to be nervous with things in the Ozarks.  I am BB fan and his staff seems to be outstanding.  Do they have something up their sleeve?  Why have they let several recruits out of their commitment but don&#8217;t seem to be getting a ton of new commits?  Not panicking, just nervous.  Would love to hear your take on the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John at MrSEC</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2013/01/mrsec-com-commitment-comparator-11713/comment-page-1/#comment-119639</link>
		<dc:creator>John at MrSEC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=266345#comment-119639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ChrisHartley 
 
The reason we include quantity as a stand-alone table is specifically to avoid over-inflating those results.  If you believe in quality, you can look at the second table.  If you&#039;re a fan of just four- and five-star guys, you can look at the third table.  Or, if you want to know who&#039;s simply signing the greatest numbers, you can view the first table.  Then we combine all three evenly into our own combo rankings in the fourth table.
 
As for A&amp;M, they announced nine early enrollees back on January 9th.  25 + 9 = 34.  So yes, they should be able to sign a huge class.
 
Again, that&#039;s why we refer to the SEC&#039;s 25-man cap as a &quot;soft&quot; cap.  
 
Many thanks for reading,
John]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ChrisHartley <br />
 <br />
The reason we include quantity as a stand-alone table is specifically to avoid over-inflating those results.  If you believe in quality, you can look at the second table.  If you&#8217;re a fan of just four- and five-star guys, you can look at the third table.  Or, if you want to know who&#8217;s simply signing the greatest numbers, you can view the first table.  Then we combine all three evenly into our own combo rankings in the fourth table.<br />
 <br />
As for A&amp;M, they announced nine early enrollees back on January 9th.  25 + 9 = 34.  So yes, they should be able to sign a huge class.<br />
 <br />
Again, that&#8217;s why we refer to the SEC&#8217;s 25-man cap as a &#8220;soft&#8221; cap.  <br />
 <br />
Many thanks for reading,<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisHartley</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2013/01/mrsec-com-commitment-comparator-11713/comment-page-1/#comment-119633</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisHartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=266345#comment-119633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice breakdown - but I have 1 question: doesn&#039;t it artificially inflate TA&amp;M in the Quantity category with 34 commits? With the SEC limit of 25, even adding back counting some, they actually can&#039;t sign all those guys can they?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice breakdown &#8211; but I have 1 question: doesn&#8217;t it artificially inflate TA&amp;M in the Quantity category with 34 commits? With the SEC limit of 25, even adding back counting some, they actually can&#8217;t sign all those guys can they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
