<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2013 Signing Class: South Carolina&#8217;s Target Zone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrsec.com/2013/02/2013-signing-class-south-carolinas-target-zone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrsec.com/2013/02/2013-signing-class-south-carolinas-target-zone/</link>
	<description>Up to the minute SEC football and basketball news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:15:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: JCB56</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2013/02/2013-signing-class-south-carolinas-target-zone/comment-page-1/#comment-122901</link>
		<dc:creator>JCB56</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 03:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=267028#comment-122901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SC only recruited one of the in-state players that ended up with Clemson, no trend to watch.  All it shows is that Spurrier is a good evaluater of talent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SC only recruited one of the in-state players that ended up with Clemson, no trend to watch.  All it shows is that Spurrier is a good evaluater of talent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mb6783</title>
		<link>http://mrsec.com/2013/02/2013-signing-class-south-carolinas-target-zone/comment-page-1/#comment-122818</link>
		<dc:creator>mb6783</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 15:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrsec.com/?p=267028#comment-122818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Next year is supposed to be a good year for the State of SC for recruiting. We should bring in more instate players, and from what I have read most of the top guys favor us right now. But I agree, we have to win more instate battles to keep our heads above Clemson and compete for SEC titles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next year is supposed to be a good year for the State of SC for recruiting. We should bring in more instate players, and from what I have read most of the top guys favor us right now. But I agree, we have to win more instate battles to keep our heads above Clemson and compete for SEC titles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
