Comments on: Signing Day 2013: The Battle For Missouri

By: XEN610

XEN610 — Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:56:31 +0000

@buddha22 @XEN610 So, like that Adam Sandler film-when Boyd says that he played at K-State, he will have meant Kansas State Pen.

By: buddha22

buddha22 — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:03:11 +0000

@XEN610 Boyd…headed to the penal league.

By: dangertim

dangertim — Thu, 07 Feb 2013 18:13:15 +0000

@XEN610 I may be dealing with just rumor and Innuendo here. But the story was that ramirez was going wherever Boyd was going. Mizzou (and other schools) backed off boyd after his FIRST arrest (drugs and tazed by police at school). K state was the only school willing to keep an offer with boyd, even when it was known he was probably going Juco. Added to that Ramirez has his own grade issues and a possibility that mizzou backed off him then….in the end KSU was the only school that could accept him acedemically (I think he tweeted out that he won’t graduate this spring).

So, in the end it was KSU or nothing for these two. After the second Boyd arrest, it’s only Ramirez IF he gets qualifying ACT scores (which isn’t much of a hurdle to get into KSU)

By: bpa_kc

bpa_kc — Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:41:57 +0000

Mizzou definitely needs to do a better job of keeping the top in-state prospects at home. I mean, while the state of MO isn’t exactly a recruiting hotbed, MU is the only division 1 football program in the state. Just locking down the borders would be a step in the right direction as far as being reasonably competitive in the SEC goes.

By: XEN610

XEN610 — Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:56:25 +0000

Curious which one got arrested? Ramirez flipping to K-State was not good. Ezekiel putting on show at the last minute is just wrong-he had no intention of flipping. Wonder what the breakdown was over the last couple of years?