<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gillispie Might Be Making A Big Mistake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mrsec.com/story/gillispie-might-be-making-a-big-mistake/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mrsec.com/story/gillispie-might-be-making-a-big-mistake</link>
	<description>Up to the minute SEC football and basketball news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:04:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BBL: Not so Rosey links to the Memphis mess &#124; MrSEC.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/story/gillispie-might-be-making-a-big-mistake/comment-page-1#comment-1287</link>
		<dc:creator>BBL: Not so Rosey links to the Memphis mess &#124; MrSEC.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrsec.com/story/gillispie-might-be-making-a-big-mistake#comment-1287</guid>
		<description>[...] Mr. SEC writes that Gillispie might be making a big mistake in suing UK. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mr. SEC writes that Gillispie might be making a big mistake in suing UK. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; BBL: Not so Rosey links to the Memphis mess John Clay&#8217;s Sidelines</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/story/gillispie-might-be-making-a-big-mistake/comment-page-1#comment-1286</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; BBL: Not so Rosey links to the Memphis mess John Clay&#8217;s Sidelines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrsec.com/story/gillispie-might-be-making-a-big-mistake#comment-1286</guid>
		<description>[...] Mr. SEC writes that Gillispie might be making a big mistake in suing UK. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mr. SEC writes that Gillispie might be making a big mistake in suing UK. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vlb</title>
		<link>http://www.mrsec.com/story/gillispie-might-be-making-a-big-mistake/comment-page-1#comment-1278</link>
		<dc:creator>vlb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrsec.com/story/gillispie-might-be-making-a-big-mistake#comment-1278</guid>
		<description>In my experience, offers that were on the table prior to litigation being brought are still likely to be on the table after it is brought.  If anything, the real prospect of litigation tends to lend focus.  

There are time when pure childishness and pride makes Defendants make foolish decision, but typically when the Defendant is paying its own legal bills and has an attorney looking out for its interests, there isn&#039;t too much game playing.  Professionals tend to want to resolve issues, not protract them.  

UK most likely does not want to fight a protracted law suit over this which only will be a distraction.  Moreover, I doubt that Gillespie really has anything much to lose as UK has already made insinuations against his character to justify firing him for not winning enough games.  

Of course, it would be foolish to comment on either sides prospects for victory in the suit without looking at the documents involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, offers that were on the table prior to litigation being brought are still likely to be on the table after it is brought.  If anything, the real prospect of litigation tends to lend focus.  </p>
<p>There are time when pure childishness and pride makes Defendants make foolish decision, but typically when the Defendant is paying its own legal bills and has an attorney looking out for its interests, there isn&#8217;t too much game playing.  Professionals tend to want to resolve issues, not protract them.  </p>
<p>UK most likely does not want to fight a protracted law suit over this which only will be a distraction.  Moreover, I doubt that Gillespie really has anything much to lose as UK has already made insinuations against his character to justify firing him for not winning enough games.  </p>
<p>Of course, it would be foolish to comment on either sides prospects for victory in the suit without looking at the documents involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
